A lawyer who is accused of making a false statement in an attempt to "hide" the alleged bribery by Gupta of former Finance Minister Mcebisi Jonas could be in hot water.
The identity of the lawyer is unknown.
But advocate Phillip Mokoena, who is part of the legal team of the judicial investigation committee to state prison, pointed out that the lawyer was in conflict with the values and ethics of the legal profession.
Mokoena, who led the evidence of Jonas on Friday, suggested that they wanted to take the matter further.
This, after Jonas had told the committee that the hawks were trying to kill the case, by preparing a statement that contradicted his previous media description that he was offered R600m in 2015 when he held the position of Minister of Finance.
Jonas said he was approached by Hawks head Berning Ntlemeza.
Ntlemeza decided to assign Major General Zinhle Mnonopi – the head of the investigation into serious corruption – to the case of the government, opened by political parties, the DA and COPE.
"Mnonopi said that this was a DA issue and that I did not want to help the DA and that they wanted to kill the case," Jonas testified.
Jonas said that Mnonopi wanted him to sign a prepared false representation statement to say that he was not a witness of corruption, but he was unwilling to do so.
"The statement was handled by a lawyer: was the identity of the lawyer revealed?" Mokoena asked Jonas.
Although Jonas replied that the name had been revealed, he could not remember.
Mokoena asked him to "take the necessary steps" to come up with the name.
Jonas also detailed his apparent encounter with one of the Gupta brothers in the family home in Saxonwold in October 2015, and events that followed the meeting.
He said that a brother of Gupta threatened to kill him if he refused the function of Minister of Finance.
READ MORE: & # 39; We have everything under control & # 39; – Jonas about what the brother of Gupta told him
Jonas said there was a palette of hostility to the Treasury about a number of things.
He mentioned examples of people who had problems with budgets and attempts to break Treasury into components.
"It became increasingly difficult to perform the constitutional role precisely because part of the performance of that role decreased over time.
"I think the highlight was the firing of Minister Nene," he said.
Jonas also said that the Treasury was dependent on the support of the president and was being undermined by some departments, which circumvented processes that forced them to go through the Treasury.
Meanwhile, committee chairman, deputy chief judge Raymond Zondo said that the committee would do its job well.
"I have to say this to you [the] legal team and investigations may not throw stone on the shelf. It does not matter who you are, if the evidence points to you, you must be followed. It does not matter what your position is or can be.
"I have put together a strong legal team, people with a track record in integrity, they will not do dirty things, I have a team of researchers whose leaders I trust and they know exactly what is expected of them.
"No attempt should be made to try to involve someone who is not involved, but there should be no attempt to get someone where the evidence suggests that that person is involved," Zondo cautioned.
KEEP UPDATE about the latest news by subscribing to our FREE newsletter.
– FOLLOW News24 on Twitter