The governors seek support in the arm and struggle with Macri for the adjustment




Yesterday met four leaders and four other provincial representatives; They are trying to add lawmakers to review the elimination of the Social Fund and the budget Credit: Twitter

The Governors of Peronist will benefit from the claim that unites them against the early elimination of the Federal Solidarity Fund, better known like
Sojero Fund, to put pressure on the government for the distribution of the adjustment burden required by the agreement with the


IMF
.

The rebellion against the decree of necessity and urgency of


Mauricio Macri
that ended last Wednesday, ahead of schedule, with the distribution of some of the revenue from soya exports between the provinces, not just alarmed governors and mayors, who receive 30% of what is dividing among the districts. It also became a platform for a new attempt at joint action between the provinces and peronist blocks of the Congress and the CGT.

That strategy was described yesterday at a meeting of the Federal Investment Council (CFI). Although only four governors were present, another four provincial chiefs sent their vices. They were Juan Manzur (Tucumán), Rosana Bertone (Tierra del Fuego), Gildo Insfrán (Formosa) and Carlos Verna (La Pampa), as well as vice-governors of San Juan, Chaco, Santiago del Estero and Catamarca. In the government yesterday there was relief because the meeting did not have the range predicted by the Peronism and because it had a strong prejudice of Kirchnerist.

The CGT leaders also participated: Juan Carlos Schmid, Héctor Daer and Carlos Acuña, and the self-appointed "", Gerardo Martínez (Uocra), Andrés Rodríguez (UPCN) and José Luis Lingeri (AySA), concerned about the impact the reduction of the Soy Fund on public works and employment. In the almost three-hour meeting on the 5th floor of the CFI decided to convene a new meeting, on Thursday or next Friday, and expand the presence: add governors and invite the heads of the Peronist bloc the Chamber of Deputies and in the Senate. Yesterday, before returning to their provinces, Manzur, Verna, Insfrán and Bertone met the head of the PJ bank in the Senate, Miguel Pichetto, who attended the next promised meeting, agreed to the need to add actors. the discussion of the next year's budget and, above all, how to complete the reduction of public expenditure by $ 300,000 million, to which the government has committed itself to the IMF. "The idea is to act in a block and gain volume in the discussion about the adjustment," he summarized
LA NACION one of the participants at the top in the GEA. With this spirit, the next call will include representatives from Kirchnerism and Front Renovator, Sergio Massa.

For the elimination of the Sojero Fund, the provinces and municipalities will not receive $ 8500 million more this year and another $ 26.500 next year. . In the short term, the arena of joint action will be the rejection of the DNU that ended with the Soy Fund. The governors want to advance both legally and legally. "We are going to ask the national legislators to agree on a bill to delete the decree that eliminates the federal solidarity fund and to block any action that damages the provinces," wrote Verna on Twitter a few minutes after he left the CFI, quickly and without making statements.

"Our legislature and the deliberative councils of the province meet to explain the rejection of the elimination of the participation of the Soy Fund to the provinces," Manzur had published a few hours earlier on the same route. The public prosecutor of Tucuman is preparing an amparo to present in the coming days.

A first sign that legislative Peronism could support the providence of the provinces was given by the head of the federal bloc in the deputies, Pablo Kosiner from Salta, that he met with mayors of his province yesterday and warned of the impact that the elimination of FS will have on the municipalities, which today allocate part of these resources to works.

topics in this note

Did you like it? this post?


Source link

The governors seek support in the arm and struggle with Macri for the adjustment




Yesterday met four leaders and four other provincial representatives; They are trying to add lawmakers to review the elimination of the Social Fund and the budget Credit: Twitter

The Governors of Peronist will benefit from the claim that unites them against the early elimination of the Federal Solidarity Fund, better known like
Sojero Fund, to put pressure on the government for the distribution of the adjustment burden required by the agreement with the


IMF
.

The rebellion against the decree of necessity and urgency of


Mauricio Macri
that ended last Wednesday, ahead of schedule, with the distribution of some of the revenue from soya exports between the provinces, not just alarmed governors and mayors, who receive 30% of what is dividing among the districts. It also became a platform for a new attempt at joint action between the provinces and peronist blocks of the Congress and the CGT.

That strategy was described yesterday at a meeting of the Federal Investment Council (CFI). Although only four governors were present, another four provincial chiefs sent their vices. They were Juan Manzur (Tucumán), Rosana Bertone (Tierra del Fuego), Gildo Insfrán (Formosa) and Carlos Verna (La Pampa), as well as vice-governors of San Juan, Chaco, Santiago del Estero and Catamarca. In the government yesterday there was relief because the meeting did not have the range predicted by the Peronism and because it had a strong prejudice of Kirchnerist.

The CGT leaders also participated: Juan Carlos Schmid, Héctor Daer and Carlos Acuña, and the self-appointed "", Gerardo Martínez (Uocra), Andrés Rodríguez (UPCN) and José Luis Lingeri (AySA), concerned about the impact the reduction of the Soy Fund on public works and employment. In the almost three-hour meeting on the 5th floor of the CFI decided to convene a new meeting, on Thursday or next Friday, and expand the presence: add governors and invite the heads of the Peronist bloc the Chamber of Deputies and in the Senate. Yesterday, before returning to their provinces, Manzur, Verna, Insfrán and Bertone met the head of the PJ bank in the Senate, Miguel Pichetto, who attended the next promised meeting, agreed to the need to add actors. the discussion of the next year's budget and, above all, how to complete the reduction of public expenditure by $ 300,000 million, to which the government has committed itself to the IMF. "The idea is to act in a block and gain volume in the discussion about the adjustment," he summarized
LA NACION one of the participants at the top in the GEA. With this spirit, the next call will include representatives from Kirchnerism and Front Renovator, Sergio Massa.

For the elimination of the Sojero Fund, the provinces and municipalities will not receive $ 8500 million more this year and another $ 26.500 next year. . In the short term, the arena of joint action will be the rejection of the DNU that ended with the Soy Fund. The governors want to advance both legally and legally. "We are going to ask the national legislators to agree on a bill to delete the decree that eliminates the federal solidarity fund and to block any action that damages the provinces," wrote Verna on Twitter a few minutes after he left the CFI, quickly and without making statements.

"Our legislature and the deliberative councils of the province meet to explain the rejection of the elimination of the participation of the Soy Fund to the provinces," Manzur had published a few hours earlier on the same route. The public prosecutor of Tucuman is preparing an amparo to present in the coming days.

A first sign that legislative Peronism could support the providence of the provinces was given by the head of the federal bloc in the deputies, Pablo Kosiner from Salta, that he met with mayors of his province yesterday and warned of the impact that the elimination of FS will have on the municipalities, which today allocate part of these resources to works.

topics in this note

Did you like it? this post?


Source link

Leave a Reply