Politics – a value-free zone filled with ambition



Dear Pete, maaaate, can you help?

Mate, sorry that I'm bothering you now. I know it's a bad timing, but I have my own little au pair problem. Yes, unbelievable, right? My children really miss our Au Pair and I have a big problem explaining why their foreign friend can not enter the country. I've seen how well done by Gillo and Russo, so I'd be looking for the same quick solution to cheer up the faces of my little ones.

Anyway, our au pair is a guy and his name is Behrouz Boochani and he is stuck on Manus Island. He tried to get into the country by boat, yes, I know, what did he think? Anyway, boring details aside, Behrouz has been around for a while, so let's get in on it, right? Anyway, do it right, pick up the phone with the right guy with the right rubber stamp at immigration, and I'll make sure your election time comes, you know what I mean?

Your little friend, Ricko

Rick Randall, Fitzroy

Relieving the weight of expectations

Peter Dutton claims that his intervention was in the cases of two au pairs routine. This is at least insincere, if not deliberately misleading. It is true that thousands of requests are submitted each year for ministerial intervention under the competences included in the migration law. However, it is far from routine that what is reported on the reported facts would be the simple visa cancellations in immigration clearance and resulting removals would reach the minister. Such decisions would normally be taken by relatively junior officers, perhaps with more senior departmental colleagues.

The fact that these cases were actually brought to the attention of Dutton suggests that the persons who have a representation were in one way or another able to break through the administrative and legal barriers that make most such requests fruitless. The fact that he chose to exercise his discretion in favor of the young women concerned indicates the very great weight he has given to their Australian connections.

Hilary Lovibond, Vaughan

Punishing the hypocrisy

Waleed Aly is on the spot to emphasize the hypocrisy of Peter Dutton as the Minister for Immigration. The only thing in the column, I hope Aly is wrong, is the suggestion that the scandal with little money will pass to Dutton. I hope that the electorate in the Minister's electorate will not let his hypocrisy pass without any costs.

Peter Roche, Carlton

FORUM

What was the point?

I became angry after reading the article about the decapitation by the Malcolm Turnbull Coalition ("A form of madness", The Age, 1/9). Thanks to the "gang that could not shoot right" we have a compromise prime minister who has no mandate from the voters.

The new policy, the new ministries and ministers differ considerably from what we voted in the last elections, so there is no mandate for them either. We do not have a current energy policy. We do not even have the acronym NEG.

The long shadow of a backlash of "the base" as represented by right-wing MPs functions as a handbrake when trying to navigate through the climate or energy wars.

So what was the real point of the recent unpleasantness in the government? It had little to do with the improvement of serving the electorate.

Ross Crawford, Frankston

A life's work

US President Donald Trump tweeted: "Google search results for Trump News show only the display / reporting of fake new media," implying that they do not publish all results for people's searches. This has prompted me to do a similar search and see what my name produced.

I discovered that most of the references in the first 100 results were to defend champion footballers – certainly not me or obituaries – hopefully not me. There were a number of criminals, a lawyer, a policeman, and even a teacher like me, but not me.

If I include specific references to addresses, work locations or newspapers that I write to come to some entries, but most of my life and the & # 39; performance & # 39; are not shown.

Maybe I should really appreciate my ordinary, semi-anonymous life for what it is, instead of looking for the fleeting fame of internet celebrity.

Dennis Fitzgerald, Box Hill

Ways of loneliness

Just like you Wendy Squires (Explanation, 1/9), I also live alone and enjoy it. I need my space to think and to think about ideas as you say.

In my loneliness I can play music, read or watch with the loudest or softest decibel without disturbing anyone.

With my two dogs, who offer me safety, they also ensure that I get the much needed exercise. By walking with them I meet other dog owners and other walkers and I connect with the local environment.

I was married unhappy and that is a loner position than having your own independence. However, a single independent woman may pose a threat to society's social norms.

Maria Liew, Woodend

Au pairs of the heart

It is heartening to hear that "compassion" was one of the criteria used to quickly follow the visa status of the au pairs. Perhaps this generosity can be extended to asylum seekers on Manus and Nauru.

Pat Agostino, St Kilda West

Unlike nature

It certainly contradicts secular humanist values ​​and the values ​​of all major religions of the world – Buddhism, Islam, Judaism and Christianity – to serve compassion for two au pairs and not to act compassionately for the 40 children who the past five years have been born on Nauru, an isolated island surrounded by ocean, where their mothers are being held while seeking security from persecution in their own country?

Scott Morrison we expect better from you. Please act with compassion.

Judy McKenzie, Hampton

Double standards

The word & # 39; hypocrisy & # 39; sums up the actions of the Minister of the Interior, Peter Dutton, with regard to issuing visas to au pairs on the basis of his claims about Australia as a "humane and generous society"; (Note 31/8).

In addition, he unknowingly unveiled the double standards of the government when considering the claims for protection of those who arrived by boat on the coast of Australia.

Dutton should stay aside and somebody who is really willing to follow the principles of Australia as a "humane and generous society". to allow all people. This person must have the moral courage to admit that Australia's current policy is morally inaccurate and must be changed and then have the integrity to see that they have changed.

The minister must exercise his ministerial discretion on behalf of all children whom he has wanted to hold on Nauru for years.

Mandy Bridges, Barwon Heads

From which side?

In the name of Australia as a "humane and generous society" these children and their families bring to Australia as quickly as possible. The Prime Minister says his government is "on your side", but the recent actions of some of his ministers would indicate that they have a very different view of what that means.

John Tingiri, Mornington

Bonehead thinking

The refusal of the Catholic Church to consider a review of celibacy for priests is just as blunt as the refusal by the LNP government to consider climate change as a factor in the response to drought. The lack of thinking and analysis is baffling.

Kay Viola, Montmorency

One rule for everyone

I see that Muslims are often asked by politicians and members of the media to agree to comply with Australian law before Sharia. Why then is not the Catholic Church in Australia obliged to make the same promise with regard to canon law, especially when we are talking about the rape of children? Why do Australian priests find it acceptable to refer decisions about the safety and welfare of Australian children to overseas jurisdiction? Why should a religious institution ignore the laws of this country on such a fundamentally important issue as the right of children to be protected from sexual assault?

Where is the indignation of the regularly indignant members of the media and the politicians? Could it be that Australia simply has different rules for Christians?

Russell MacDonald, Elwood

The Carlton blues

One way Carlton can be competitive is to run a club that wants to play good players in order not to walk away ("Blues eye big fish, friendlier draw", The Age, 1/9). Talking about "a friendlier draw" is ridiculous after a season in which they won only two games. Excitement about new recruits is also ridiculous when we see the likes of Eddie Betts, Lachie Henderson, Zach Tuohy, Bryce Gibbs, Josh Kennedy and Sam Jacobs, who play great games for other clubs. Carlton is now building from scratch – but why did they have to scratch & # 39; – and have taught them to get away and stay away from & # 39; scratch & # 39; !? We can only hope – with little evidence to support that hope.

David Kettle, Northcote

Pedestrian mortality wish

The editorial (1/9) was a good initiative, but lacked a relevant factor, namely the suicidal behavior of some pedestrians. I rarely ride in the CBD, but in Swan Street, Richmond, pedestrians come from all sides in traffic. Some within few meters of designated intersections and without any sense of self-preservation.

Many are young and agile, but then there are also middle-aged men, mostly men, who seem to do some sort of right to do what they want. Others cross the border crossing points, but against the warning lights and are usually on the phone. We all know that there are annoying dangerous drivers, but sometimes the best driver can not avoid a stupid pedestrian.

Michael Hipkins, Richmond

Judge word

With regard to terminating the word "slut" because it "makes a value judgment", if all words that make value judgments are "retired", how boring and sterile the language would be. But perhaps here is objection to language that judges or differentiates on the basis of sexual behavior, in particular the sexual behavior of a woman?

If a man has many sexual partners, some admirably call him a "stallion" for his attraction, strength and potency, while a woman is called a "slut" for the same behavior in a denigrating sense.

However, instead of doing a Big Brother destruction of language work on certain words, those who reject worthless words might be the "loud and proud." approach. It is powerful when communities such as the queer community, or some in the black American community, claim to embrace and use their own, and challenging, terms that were once used to humiliate and abuse them.

Deborah Morrison, Malvern East

Must do better

The Australian James Ricketson gets six years in a Cambodian prison with no convincing evidence or apparent outrage or support from the Australian government, yet the government gives $ 44 million to Cambodia for a few refugees seeking asylum in Australia to settle there. On the other hand, European au pair young women get a much better treatment from the government, and young men who have been imprisoned for years on Manus are losing hope. Of course we can do better.

Helen Stagoll, Alphington

Use the evidence

Although it was reassuring to read that the new Secretary of Energy Angus Taylor will not bring any ideology into his portfolio, I sincerely hope that he will use scientific evidence of Australia's role in climate change and its disastrous consequences as a basis for policy.

Marie Pirotta, Carlton

Criticism is healthy

Michael Kroger who attacks Ted Baillieu to make public a widely shared internal picture of the problem of the liberal party with women has to be called. Criticism is what separates democracy from one-party states, and is ironic for a party that apparently advocates free speech.

Dylan Bailey, Parkville

AND ANOTHER THING

Politics

Is not Tony Abbott a special envoy of indigenous affairs, a bit like Tony Abbott as minister of women?

Helen Davison, Burnley

Ewa Haire (Letters, 1/9) is right: "What is good does not come in". But what is white does it for sure.

Peter Rushen, Carnegie

It is good to see that Peter Dutton could take his altruistic mission to help au pairs who underwent deportation to build up a leadership problem.

Thos Puckett, Ashgrove

Will there be an explicit line of immigration at Tullamarine for au pairs and white South African farmers?

Brian Glass, Montrose

A great view of Julie Bishop by Peter Hartcher (Explanation, 1/9). Her omission typifies the vision that women's current conservative leadership has.

Lindsay Donahoo, Wattle Glen

Let's all call the AFL to lobby to get the refugees from Manus and Nauru and Christmas Island. White privilege works.

Joe Connor, Elwood

furthermore

After we have heard the patronizing manner of Archbishop Mark Coleridge, as we say to young children, "Put on your ears".

Bev Touzel, Carlton North

I just saw how Barack Obama spoke at John McCain's funeral. What a parallel universe with the "Trumpesphere".

Reg Murray, Varna, Bulgaria

The reports from Age Secret State make me think we need "ViciLeaks".

Tom Danby, Coburg North

Perhaps Chelsea Manning would be more successful if she claimed she was an au pair instead of a whistleblower.

Jan Newmarch, Oakleigh

Another disastrous decision from the AFL: no footy on Father's Day.

Brian Morley, Donvale


Source link

Leave a Reply