London – The international tennis federation supported on Monday the judge who sanctioned Serena Williams for three violations of the codes of conduct during the American ladies' finale. Open and stressed that their "decisions were in accordance with the relevant rules".
The American tennis player received three sanctions by incumbent judge Carlos Ramos on Saturday for his violations during his defeat with 6-2, 6-4 for the Japanese Naomi Osaka: for receiving instructions from his trainer; for breaking his racket, which automatically cost him a point; and because he called Ramos a thief, a violation for verbal abuse & # 39; that cost him a game.
The tournament announced Sunday that Williams was fined $ 10,000 for "verbal abuse" against the judge, $ 4,000 for a warning for escorting his coach, and $ 3,000 for breaking the racket. The money will be deducted from its price of 1.85 million second.
The International Tennis Federation (ITF for the acronym in English) reported Monday that the sanctions imposed by Ramos were "reaffirmed by the US decision." Open to Serena Williams for the three violations. & # 39;
"Ramos took his duty as a judge in accordance with the relevant regulations and acted with professionalism and integrity at all times," emphasized the governing body of world tennis.
In the second game of the second set, Ramos Williams warned of receiving directions from his coach, which is in conflict with Grand Slam matches. Williams briefly discussed the warning and the Portuguese judge said that cheating is the thing I never did & # 39;. Later, however, his coach Patrick Mouratoglou acknowledged that he was trying to send a signal to the American.
"I have never cheated in my life!" Williams told Ramos: "You owe me an excuse."
According to Article III, section P, "verbal abuse" is defined as "a statement to a judge, rival, sponsor, spectator or other person who implies dishonesty or who is disdainful, abusive or excessive". The section indicates that a player You can get a fine of up to $ 20,000 for each offense.
It was the third big fight between Williams and a judge in Flushing Meadows after his infamous tantrum for a failure of the foot in the semifinal of 2009 against Kim Clijsters and his argument about a bad call in the 2011 final against Sam Stosur.