Final proof. We tested that Snapdragon is better than Exynos

For years (since the Galaxy S8 from 2017), Samsung has had two different processors in its top models: each with its current best Exynos ipset and a different current peak from Qualcomm. You usually do not see these variants on the market, as Samsung sells elsewhere. In Europe, most customers get models with Exynos, while Samsung’s buds are on sale with Qualcomm’s Snapdragons. And the user of these models has been competing together for years to decide which of the versions will be better.

Unfortunately for us, in recent years this battle, but led by the long run, has been won by Snapdragon processors: according to various tests, they are powerful and very controversial. However, we have not been able to verify this assumption so far: Samsung has some models in Europe, even with top chip sets from Qualcomm (two are for your smartphones with a flexible display), but we equipped this phone with an IP from Samsung and its US supplier. .

Until now and all. Mon, quite surprising because Samsung made this comparable to the new Galaxy S20 FE model, which will also be available in two versions. Variant with 4G support for Exynos 990, designed Galaxy S20 FE 5G with Snapdragon 865. At first glance, this is a somewhat special step, considering that Exynos 990 can support 5G.

On the other hand, Samsung does not disclose the differences between the models in any way, and in fact it suggests that the powerful Snapdragon in the 5G version is such an added bonus for the owners of this variant of the phone. For this you have to pay for Samsung, in which case, according to the official price, it didn’t have 3,000 crowns. And when you order the customer for less than 20,000 kroner 5G variant, you get a little extra power and a slightly better vdr battery.

In a recent review of the S20 FE model, we mentioned that if it just doesn’t activate after 5G support, the surcharge doesn’t make much sense. Only Vodafone will offer the 5G version of the S20 FE for around CZK 17,201, and on the contrary, it pays off: not only will the phone be a bit more usable in the future thanks to 5G, but you’ll also get slightly better features. And we know how much.

Difference with the naked eye

In the editorial, we had a classic Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (on photos in orange colors) and so the Galaxy S20 FE 5G (in June). And we put both phones to the test, which clearly shows how there are differences between them.

We started with bnm pouvnm. We installed applications in the phone and restored them from the backup, we ran both machines for a while (we exchanged them fairly) and then they tried to observe some differences in their breeding. Of course you practically do not exist: when surfing the web, watching videos or playing regular games (let’s not be among those who like edges of graphically short actions on a mobile phone), the difference is not visible in our opinion. It is possible that someone will notice subtle nuances, but in this regard, both suitable representatives of the S20 series behave the same at first glance.

The Snmky of the S20 FE with an Exynos processor

With one exception. This is a photo camera. For many users one of the longest bites of their smartphone. Right at the focus, there was a difference in performance and the culture device appeared. No, a smartphone with Exynos or Snapdragon does not take images of different quality. We did the same by taking photos in the same conditions and the same scenes, and it seems that Samsung has been able to match the software with the hardware in both cases, so the cameras’ results are practically identical. Yes, here and there we find differences in the exposition in the photos, in the drawn details and in the art, only we find them even if we make the same scene twice in a row with our mobile phone. We wouldn’t be looking at the processor either, and we won’t be here.

Snmky from the S20 FE 5G model has a Snapdragon processor

However, we noticed a slight delay in the recording image itself. The 4G variant equipped with the Snapdragon processor simply did not respond to the pressure on the spout as easily as the 5G version made with Qualcomm. His phone shared a photo when we touched the handcuffs. In the case of the 4G version, this also meant that the phone responded downward when pressed. This happened especially when we took a series of snmk: with Snapdragon you can cut the picture one by one in the screen, with Exynos the user has to convert a fraction of a second. It’s nothing else, plus it’s a possible detail that could be fine-tuned in some of the future software updates (both phones had the most up-to-date version of their software), but the difference is simply that.

Benchmarkm vldne Qualcomm

Synthetic performance testing is then confirmed by some control over the Qualcomm processor sovereignty. In the popular benchmark of AnTuT version 8 (which according to Google is a security risk and which you will not find in Google Play), the performance of the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE in the 4G version was around 530,000 points and the maximum was around the 533,000 points. The Galaxy S20 FE 5G achieved a stable score of around 580,000 points in the same test. Snapdragon’s jump in performance is up to about ten percent, it’s not a drama, but it’s a demonstrable and measurable difference.

In addition, as shown by the new test in the 3D Mark Benchmark – Wild Life Stress Test, the Snapdragon processor is much more stable in its performance. With long-term performance, it drops much less than the sharp top end of Exynos and Snapdragon.

Comparison of performance stability in the 3D Mark Wild Life Stress Test benchmark. Top S20 FE 5G with Snapdragon processor, bottom 4G variant with Exynos processor

We saw a jet difference in the score in the JetStream2 web benchmark, where Exynos achieved a score of 56,238 points, a model with a Snapdragon of 70,363 points. This difference is in line with what we have observed in this benchmark for a long time: Exynos processors in it show more significant values ​​than competing Snapdragons or you, Kirina from Huawei. Despite the FE’s 5G variants, the answer is that even with a slight shortage in the size of RAM (the S20 FE models have 6 GB of RAM), the 4G version is 5G (only lost about 2.5 points).

However, the GFXBench test shows that performance differences may not have a dramatic effect in practice. In the CarChase 3.1 benchmark, both phones show a result of 43 frames per second when plotted on the display, while the off-sceen test has a 5G variant with a value of 50 fps at one frame.

The Snapdragon model is then shown in PC Mark tests. Overall, the difference in Work 2.0 is not dramatic in any way, and this again shows that we do not perceive differences between phones in normal use. The score is 11,947 versus 12,305 points made in favor of 5G. In the Computer Vision test, which tests the AI ​​capabilities of the ipset, the 5G variant with Qualcomm is a leap forward: 8,200 compared to 6,798 points. And according to the test, this variant also works significantly faster with loitm: the score is 19,130 ​​compared to 15,366 points.

Significant difference in battery

After all, the differences are even in the battery. In our experience with top-class Samsungs with Exynos processors over the years, these processors, for example, show noticeable power consumption while shooting. Simply put, Samsung kicks years into shooting the battery indicator much faster than its snapdragons competitors. And the Galaxy S20 FE pair actually confirms this.

First, pay attention to the normal instructions and test. When we first turned on the phones and installed all the applications from the clouds, we fully charged before arresting this horse. Then we ran the AnTuT benchmark on them three times in a row, and only after these activities was the difference in terms of battery very noticeable. While the 5G model showed an 80% battery, the Exynos variant showed a 73% battery. This means that even these Exynos used a lot more energy for their aunt, and that’s a huge difference. Let’s add that the difference was also in the heating temperature, the Snapdragon design was always colder.

Tests in
Tests in

PC Mark Work 2.0 Battery Crash Test – Snapdragon on the left, Exynos on the right

Yes, it turned out, the initial setup of a phone with large amounts of data download and the subsequent test in the AnTuT test are probably the worst case when the Exynos shortage is at its greatest. When we left the phones charged in this state overnight and the next morning they passed a complete battery of tests for this line, finally the Galaxy S20 FE 5G showed 56% of remaining battery capacity before noon, 4G variant 45% . As a result, the gap between the models has increased by just 4 percentage points of capacity, which means that the Exynos consumed about a quarter more energy than the Snapdragon.

These differences are then confirmed by the battery test in the PC Mark kits. From fully charged to the limit of 20%, when the test is complete, the 5G model reported vdr 10 hours and 25 minutes, 4G performed 8 hours and 46 minutes. The comparison will be lower when almost completely switched to minutes: the 5G version lasted 625 minutes, the 4G version then 526 minutes. This is a difference of exactly 99 minutes, which means that the 5G variant is up 18.8% in the test.

After completing this test one day in the evening, we let the phones fly until morning and checked the battery condition again: the model with the Snapdragon showed 19%, so the machine consumed only one percent of the power at night. battery. The 4G variant with Exynos showed 16% of the battery, so it consumed 4% of energy. Yes, this is very imprecise, yet the difference is clearly visible. Let’s add that the phones didn’t have a SIM card and both were only connected to wifi (in the same city, with the same active syncs in the background).

Snapdragon is clearly at the top

All our tests, even those carried out in applications with a small name or our subjectivity, clearly show that the Snapdragon processor is on top of the corresponding Exynos in the case of peak Samsung. In our view, the difference in performance is not dramatic, usually up to ten percent, although in extremes it can be up to twenty. But in practice, the user does not ignore it.

However, we think there is a difference in the battery compartment. Exynos is noticeable on top, which can be off-putting in someone’s palm, but second, it shows the processor is less efficient in power consumption. And the difference in heat is about 20% at best, but in extreme situations, Exynos consumes a little more energy than Snapdragon. And these are the values ​​that can decide at a wonderful moment whether the phone will last the second day without charging or not. Yes, both models will probably require the same charging every day, and in the vast majority of situations there will be a dramatic difference, but if necessary, you just have more confidence with the 5G Galaxy S20 FE.

That is ultimately the reason that Samsung installed a processor from Qualcomm in the 5G variant. Operation in a 5G battery can take a lot of time, and the efficiency is a little extra. From a common order point of view, it also pays off that if you buy models at Samsung prices, they don’t have to pay 3,000 kronor for 5G, performance and better vdr batteries very attractive. But if we talk about a difference of about 200 crowns, as in the case of the Samsung Galaxy S20 5G from Vodafone’s offer, it is clear: paying a little here may well be an obligation.

Source link