A hundred people participated in a copyright event



The European Parliament and Council Directive on copyright in the digital single market, according to Pirates, contains two very problematic articles. Article 11 recommends that Member States introduce a link tax that allows publishers to charge a fee for a simple reference or an example of the article. "Article 11 is designed to ensure that Google News, Facebook, Wikipedia, Twitter or the Czech list of links with the previews of the articles pay publishers a fee," Tomáš Martínek (Pirates) said today. But it would probably reduce the profits of publishers themselves if these large platforms decided to refer to news sites for example that should not be published.

According to the chairman of the party, Ivan Bartoš, it is mainly a business dispute. "I'm sorry if the business models and efforts to make money are passed on to laws," he added.

The publishers' union said the pirates were raising their voice against improving the copyright protection of artists, composers, film and television producers and against all publishers and publishers. "They remain aware of the interests of technology giants – Google, Facebook and other digital platforms," ​​the union said in a press release.

For example, the proposal is supported by MEP Pavel Svoboda (KDU-ČSL). European copyright law has been "faded around 2000 by technologies such as satellite or cable broadcasts", but there is no copyright-protected work available. "That is exactly the purpose of this directive – to adapt the law to the internet environment," Svoboda said at the beginning of July. According to him, it can not be ruled out that this may result in some limitations of the current situation. "It's not about censorship," he said.

According to the pirate, Article 13 poses an even greater risk and compels service providers such as Google or various forums where data can be stored to actively scan files against a central database of authors' works. In essence, this requirement implies the introduction of automated filters that small companies can not use. The interpretation of the proposed directive Pirates and other critics, according to the executive director of the Union of Publishers Václav Mach, are false. The reform aims to strike a balance between the interests of all parties involved in the value chain on the internet.

"Rights are violated today, especially by companies such as Google or Facebook, and we believe journalists need protection similar to musicians, and they deserve compensation for such violations," publishers said in a letter under Reflex.cz is the head of the Czech news center, Libuše Šmuclerová, the Economia publishing house Roman Latuske, Petr Marek of the Vltava Labe Media and another 13 people.

On the other hand, List.cz refuses the operation. According to him, copyright protection is already sufficient, although law enforcement often lags behind legislative reality. "Article 11 is primarily a threat to users and readers who would not receive such a wide range of news content as now, after it has been approved in a version approved by the Legal Committee of the European Parliament," said Věra Průchová, a specialist for contact with the public administration of Seznam.cz. A similar provision was introduced in Spain and Germany and did not achieve the desired result in one of these countries. For the company itself, however, the directive is not a big risk. "List.cz is not just a search engine that is related to the content of others, but an important media company, including its own successful news list," she added. Although the company believes that these articles are problematic, it is necessary to harmonize copyright throughout the Union.

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Mafra Publishing House Štěpán Košík CTK said that the group is leading the internal debate, its opinion will be published next week. The Protective Association did not want to comment on the situation.


Source link

Leave a Reply