European journalists supported the call for copyright protection

update: 28.08.2018 09:50

Prague – A dozen European journalists supported the call for MEPs to impose on large internet platforms the obligation to transfer part of their financial profits to the media whose media articles, photos & video & # 39 ; s refer to. The European Parliament will discuss the European Copyright Directive in mid-September, but it is uncertain whether this financial obligation will be maintained. In July MEPs found insufficient support for him.

The dispute concerns in particular Article 11, which allows publishers to charge a fee for a simple link or preview of an article on internet platforms. In practice, platforms such as Google News, Facebook, Wikipedia, Twitter or even the Czech list are expected to share the profits that the ad achieves. Platforms defend this, as critics of some political institutions, such as the pirate parties who claim to defend the freedom of the Internet.

On the initiative of the AFP AFP of the French AFP news agency Sammy Ketz, active in the Middle East, a petition requesting the maintenance of Article 11 in the Directive is maintained. According to him, it is the issue of the continued existence of independent media in Europe, confirming ownership rights to internet-based creation. Without this article, journalists would continue to work de facto for the platforms, free, anonymously and without any recognition.

103 journalists from 27 European countries, including a number of national and international journalists, have signed the call. The Czech Republic joined the Czech editor-in-chief Radka Marková, Czech TV news writer Jakub Szántó and Czech radio journalist Lucie Vopálenská. The article by one of the most respected AFP journalists today printed a number of European media, including a number of Czech news sites.

Ketz drew attention to the problem through the opinion of war reporters whose financial crisis in the crisis is extremely demanding for the media. "For more than 40 years in the journalistic sector, I have witnessed the fact that the number of journalists in the place where something is happening is gradually decreasing, which increases the risk of journalists being killed, we have become targets. and our outposts are getting more and more money, "he wrote.

"The times that a jacket, a t-shirt and a pocket of a document have been sufficient are long gone, now you need a bulletproof vest, armored cars, sometimes personal guards and insurances, which ensure , and a lot, "Ketz said. .

"Despite paying content and sending journalists who risk their own lives to make reliable, comprehensive and credible news, it's not the ones who make the most of it, they're internet platforms that do not have to pay a penny, it's completely the same, as someone else who comes in and absolutely shamelessly reaps the fruits of your work – you can not apologize for such a thing in democracy and it is even morally unjustifiable, "said the press news agency.

"Many friends ended up at the newspaper because their publisher failed or could no longer pay," he added.

AFP Sammy Ketze & # 39; s open letter to MEPs signed by journalists from a number of European countries:

Dear members,

I was on a report in Mosul, the former capital of the Islamic state in northern Iraq. I tried to capture the joy of the children returning to school in a devastated city. The jihadists, who dominated the city until last year, were closed. Just before our return to Baghdad, I sat with a photographer and an AFP cameraman in a café. At that moment my attention on the computer drew an article about copyright and an attempt to introduce it for journalists.

After five years of war in Syria, where I have escaped sniper bullets many times, I have come to Iraq for the third time since 2003. For more than 40 years I have seen in the journalistic industry how the number of journalists at the place where something happens, gradually decreases. It increases the risks that journalists can make. We have become goals and our outposts are becoming more and more money.

The time that a jacket, a t-shirt and some papers in our pocket were enough is long gone. Now you need a bulletproof vest, armored cars, sometimes personal guards and insurance. Who does all this? Media. And it is a lot.

Despite paying content and sending journalists who risk their own lives to produce reliable, comprehensive and credible news, it is not those who benefit from it. They are internet platforms that do not even have to pay a cent. It is exactly the same as when someone else comes and completely blatantly harvest the fruits of your work. You can not excuse such a thing in democracy and it is not even morally defensible.

Many friends ended up at the newspaper because their publisher was bankrupt or unable to pay them. Until they hung their pens and cameras on a nail, they often spent time hiding behind the wall as the earth vibrated and rockets flashed around them. At the same time they were lucky to describe the world what they saw with their own eyes. Meanwhile, incredible encounters with real warriors and their teeth with armed assistants playing with pistols and knives the moment they interviewed their boss. They felt intolerable regret when they met boring citizens, while women tried to protect their children in a bunker whose walls were trembling under the breeze and explosions.

The media took a long time before they managed to respond. However, it concerned consequences rather than consequences. Because their money has come, fired are often absurd. There are newspapers where practically no journalists are. It must end. Media rights must be respected in order to deliver reliable news. The proceeds from the sale must belong to those who actually make the content. Whether it is journalists or artists.

We can no longer tolerate lies with Google and Facebook that the copyright directive endangers free internet access. No! Free internet access remains because internet giants can pay the media for content that they now use for free. The media do not have to earn money from readers.

Does it seem impossible to you? Not by chance. Facebook earned 16 billion dollars last year, Google $ 12.7 billion. They just have to pay bills. And they have to pay them as far as the media survive. Internet titans will really contribute to the diversity and freedom of the press, which they say support them.

I am convinced that MEPs, who have been fooled by fraudulent lobbing, now understand that free internet access is not at stake. The freedom of the press is at stake, because freedom will disappear when newspapers come to the press.

I have met many times with people who have been completely defenseless and only wanted to have one thing to do with me. "Tell the people you saw, we only have a chance that we will be saved." I have to answer it like this: "Do not try to make hope, are we the last journalists and soon there will be no money, because we have money?"

Keep in mind that Facebook and Google do not employ journalists and do not create content. But they are paid for the advertisement that appears in the content that journalists make.

Every day journalists examine all aspects of life to inform citizens. Every year the most talented and the most talented of them are valued. We can not afford not to appreciate anyone because journalists will not be enough. It is time to do something about it. The European Parliament must support copyright by an overwhelming majority in order to survive democracy and one of the most prominent symbols of it: journalism.

Sammy Ketz

Head of the AFP department in Baghdad, war reporter and holder of many journalistic awards






Source link

Leave a Reply