Violent death of 15-year-old Mia: Kandel hopes to end the trauma: on Monday, the verdict in the case of Mia
After the violent death of a 15-year-old in Kandel, the court pronounces the verdict this Monday. Accused is a refugee from Afghanistan. The verdict is also expected in view of the troubled situation in Chemnitz with tensions.
It is the provisional final legal act of a crime that goes far beyond the Palatine town of Kandel. Shortly after Christmas, a 15-year-old girl is reportedly stabbed to death by a refugee from Afghanistan. More than eight months later, the court in Landau pronounces the judgment this Monday.
The indictment is murder. In fact, it is a process like any other, says Robert Schelp, spokesperson for the court. But that is only partly true. Kandel has become a buzzword in the conflict about German migration policy – like now Chemnitz.
Dreyer hopes for calm
Like the Saxon city, there have been protests from various political groups since the recent events on Saturday in Kandel. Sometimes there are riots. For the Prime Minister of Rhineland-Palatinate, Malu Dreyer (SPD), it is "unbearable" that right-wing circles instrumentalize the death of 15-year-old Mia and turn Kandel upside down with demonstrations. "It is of course the hope of all of us that there will be more peace in Kandel when the process is over," she emphasizes.
With a bread knife the perpetrator stabbed several times on December 27, 2017 in a pharmacy. The Prosecution believes that it is Abdul D. – the ex-friend of Mia. The young man is being held by passers-by, reports an eyewitness. "He just stood there and said nothing." On the other hand, Mia's friends call the seriously injured "Stay there!" And "Stay awake!". In vain: the girl dies in the hospital.
"The political dimension that comes from outside"
For Kandel, a town with nearly 9,000 inhabitants in the southern Palatinate halfway between Landau and Karlsruhe, the act is still traumatic. Something similar has not experienced the people there. As soon as someone has robbed the bank, a woman remembers that. But the perpetrator was immediately taken away. And now such a crime that caused the sensation nationwide and stepped into the vortex of the dispute over the German refugee policy.
Federal president Frank-Walter Steinmeier received Kandel & # 39; s mayor Volker Poß (SPD) demonstratively in Berlin. And recently party leader Robert Habeck traveled to Kandel. "The political dimension that is interpreted here comes from the outside", says spokesman Schelp.
Restricted procedure with engraved information
For Landau it is a process of superlatives, with great security measures to protect the accused, the trial participants and the court. Imposing is the Palace of Justice with its mighty dome in the glow of the sun. "Non-public test", is on the strip next to a door. When Abdul D. was arrested, he was a minor. And juvenile justice is negotiated without an audience. The public interest is big, but it is a process behind closed doors.
The problem with this: since the beginning of the process, details about the case of media have repeatedly been repeated – by whom it is unclear. They remain uncommentated by the authorities and therefore without classification.
Statements and pleadings under lock and key
Would not it be better to open negotiations so that everyone can get an idea of themselves? In no case, says Dirk Lammer, specialist in criminal law. "The goal of the juvenile justice system is not to give everyone an idea, but to ensure that the court is able to get a good picture of the crime and the suspect", he says emphatically.
Experts and witnesses were heard, including former housemates of Abdul D. and the parents of Mia. Their statements are as limited as the plea. What did the public prosecutor demand, what did the defense mean? The observer does not know it yet.
He is faced with a maximum of 15 years and deportation
Abdul D. arrived in April 2016 as a minor unaccompanied refugee. Since September 2017 he lived in a residential group in Neustadt / Weinstraße. When Mia divorced him, he would have persecuted and threatened her. The parents filed a complaint.
At the trial issue for the youth room I, the accused expressed remorse, as they say. The maximum penalty for him is 10 years in prison under juvenile criminal law – or for a "special severity of guilt" for up to 15 years. In the case of a final conviction, he may be deported after a partially convicted conviction.
In the video: right-wing extremists break through a police blockade in Chemnitz
FLR / dpa