Modernization of the old Postscheckamt in Kreuzberg: protests from investors against the district

That tenants in Berlin are protesting with banners on their houses against rent increases and repression is now part of daily life. But recently an investor has taken this protest. The CG Group of entrepreneur Christoph Gröner criticizes a huge poster in the former Postscheckamt in Kreuzberg that their construction project on the site is not progressing.

"Red-red-green (Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg) here prevents 623 apartments, including 182 subsidized units and 55 low-cost housing units," it says. And: "The Berlin Senate is watching." He finds no other way, Gröner said Tuesday against the demonstration and accused the district of blocking the design of the district – and that after several years of planning.

The district rejects the accusations. The district office had promoted both the political and the administrative level, the procedure for the development plan, so Baustadtrat Florian Schmidt (Green).

Protest on the façade: the CG group sees itself as being disadvantaged by the neighborhood.

Protest on the façade: the CG group sees itself as being disadvantaged by the neighborhood.

A turning point in the process, however, was the announcement by the CG Group in January 2018 to change its approach. The amendment stipulates that the share of living space will be reduced from 64 percent to 57 percent. The share of the commercial space is expected to increase from 36 to 43 percent. Background: Commercial areas are now again considered a lucrative investment because the supply is scarce. Renting offices can usually generate higher rents than renting apartments. The change in the concept also questioned the earlier early involvement of the public, argues the Baustadrat. The district council did not accept the change. "It is absurd to blame the district office for the stagnation of the construction project," says Florian Schmidt.

To make matters worse, the CG Group has misrepresented the results of early public participation with & # 39; alleged & # 39; civil intentions to justify changes in the concept that underlie return-driven motivation. This is unique in this form and makes a relationship of trust more difficult.

CG Group also criticizes the Senate

In the e-mail traffic, Gröner had previously argued that "the residents criticized the increase in traffic and space requirements that accompanied the creation of living space". The dialogue between Gröner and Schmidt culminates in a letter of July 25 in which Gröner spoke about "unsustainable political circumstances" and "dilettantism" – and stated that this meant only Schmidt. The CG group had made part of the correspondence with the district public on Tuesday.

The CG group also criticizes the Senate. For example, the clearinghouse has declared incompetent in the dispute. The Senate Department for Urban Development has stated that it is constantly supervising the project. However, the planning authority for the development plan procedure is at the Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg district, according to spokeswoman Katrin Dietl. "However, given the pending clarification and negotiation processes, there are no problems in the project for which a solution could be found through the three-tier decision-making structure of the clearinghouse." The clearing house could not replace political decision-making at district level, according to Dietl. An interview with the investor and district secretary Sebastian Scheel should serve to get the negotiation partners back to a table in order to prevent a threatening project coming to a standstill.

Source link

Leave a Reply