The Greens must explain color in the refugee problem



DThe Greens just do a lot of things right. According to recent polls, they are just behind the SPD in the Bund. In Bavaria, where on 14 October was chosen, the party can currently hope to take second place with 16 percent behind the CSU. While the Social Democrats are despairing themselves, CDU and CSU still lick the wounds of their recent confrontation and the FDP calls in vain for attention, the Greens seem to fly everything this summer. The political company is not self-purifying, they present it as a great pleasure. Her subjects are serious enough, despite the good mood not to come as a fun party. The Greens are already on their way to the People's Party, as a successor to the SPD could appeal to the entire electorate to the left of the center. Some opinion polls say that the party has a voter potential of more than 30 percent.

Robert Habeck and Annalena Baerbock, the new party leadership, embody a new beginning: young, well informed, and sympathetic. Both have a talent to put themselves in the spotlight. If Habeck hand in a Bundeswehr helicopter, which is always worth a message. Or if Baerbock bites in a non-vegan hot dog. "Glück & pledge" is the name of her summer tour, which also led to the castle Hambach and the Teuteburg Forest. Their game with national symbols, until recently still hostile images of the Greens, has exactly the right amount of media that is well marketed. All other politicians who travel through the country look pretty old-fashioned.

It is not just tones and rhetoric. The new leadership cut a few old braids from the start: the dogma of separation of function and mandate, a holy cow for decades, was abruptly suspended for Habeck to become president. Where the top positions were always awarded in accordance with the price of wings, two reals can suddenly have a majority – which of course give wings. The new leaders want to take the party out of the comfort zone of eternal truths, get rid of the image of the party of stubborn do-it-yourself. And so the party takes topics about issues that hurt green souls: genetic manipulation, world trade, homeland. For the Greens these are not small things.

In the joy mixed with a pinch of suspicion

And yet the phenomenon is not completely unknown. Strong leaders could get out of the Greens much earlier. In 1994, Joschka Fischer conducted the personal election campaign that was entirely focused on him. Shortly after the Petra Kelly and Gert Bastian wanted to stick to the rotation principle shortly after the departure of the Greens in the Bundestag, it was abolished shortly thereafter. Because the Greens make a clear claim to the government, the management staff is programmatically more mobile than the officers and the base.


Source link

The Greens must explain color in the refugee problem



DThe Greens just do a lot of things right. According to recent polls, they are just behind the SPD in the Bund. In Bavaria, where on 14 October was chosen, the party can currently hope to take second place with 16 percent behind the CSU. While the Social Democrats are despairing themselves, CDU and CSU still lick the wounds of their recent confrontation and the FDP calls in vain for attention, the Greens seem to fly everything this summer. The political company is not self-purifying, they present it as a great pleasure. Her subjects are serious enough, despite the good mood not to come as a fun party. The Greens are already on their way to the People's Party, as a successor to the SPD could appeal to the entire electorate to the left of the center. Some opinion polls say that the party has a voter potential of more than 30 percent.

Robert Habeck and Annalena Baerbock, the new party leadership, embody a new beginning: young, well informed, and sympathetic. Both have a talent to put themselves in the spotlight. If Habeck hand in a Bundeswehr helicopter, which is always worth a message. Or if Baerbock bites in a non-vegan hot dog. "Glück & pledge" is the name of her summer tour, which also led to the castle Hambach and the Teuteburg Forest. Their game with national symbols, until recently still hostile images of the Greens, has exactly the right amount of media that is well marketed. All other politicians who travel through the country look pretty old-fashioned.

It is not just tones and rhetoric. The new leadership cut a few old braids from the start: the dogma of separation of function and mandate, a holy cow for decades, was abruptly suspended for Habeck to become president. Where the top positions were always awarded in accordance with the price of wings, two reals can suddenly have a majority – which of course give wings. The new leaders want to take the party out of the comfort zone of eternal truths, get rid of the image of the party of stubborn do-it-yourself. And so the party takes topics about issues that hurt green souls: genetic manipulation, world trade, homeland. For the Greens these are not small things.

In the joy mixed with a pinch of suspicion

And yet the phenomenon is not completely unknown. Strong leaders could get out of the Greens much earlier. In 1994, Joschka Fischer conducted the personal election campaign that was entirely focused on him. Shortly after the Petra Kelly and Gert Bastian wanted to stick to the rotation principle shortly after the departure of the Greens in the Bundestag, it was abolished shortly thereafter. Because the Greens make a clear claim to the government, the management staff is programmatically more mobile than the officers and the base.


Source link

Leave a Reply