The “other” Olympiacos with zero, one behind and the Fortuni solution in front of the goal! | Superleague Interwetten



Daily Novi Specials Bets and Super Boosting Odds! (21+)

Olympiacos has had 23 wins in his last 28 games in Karaiskaki in all competitions for a year now, since the end of October 2019. In his other five games, he has three losses and two draws.

What can we do, easy to see in these five games of his? Simply that he only scored two goals, in the two 1-1 draw, with PAOK (Valbouena penalty in the regular season) and Wolves (El Arabi). He lost the remaining three games with the same score (0-1) to Arsenal, PAOK (playoffs) and City.

The truth is that these five games were probably his most difficult Olympic throughout the year. Together with those with Marseille (1-0), PAOK (2-0, Cup), the Red Star (1-0) and to a lesser extent those with PAO (1-0, 1-0, 3- 0), AEK (2-0, 3-0) and Omonia (2-0).

We have so an example of his 14 fights Olympic in Europe and in derbies. Safe enough to draw conclusions. More clearly? THE Olympic wins all his difficult matches, but with one condition: don’t concede a goal! If he concedes even one goal, he never wins! The conclusion is justified by one of the most important games of last season before the one-year period we analyze. Think of the 2-3 from Bayern and the 2-2 with Tottenham on the one hand and the 4-0 with Krasnodar, the 2-0 with Basaksehir and the 4-0 with Plisen on the other. And the sample reaches 19 games in Karaiskaki, in which we see the same thing: if he doesn’t score a goal Olympic will win, if he eats a goal, he won’t win!

To go and away from Karaiskaki in his battle? Is it the same project here? Which difficult competitions did Olympiacos win last year and this year? Arsenal 1-0 (in the 90th minute), Basaksehir 1-0, PAOK twice in Toumba 1-0, AEK 2-1 in OAKA, Krasnodar 2-1. And, in second place, Atromitos 1-0, OFI 1-0, Larissa 1-0, Aris 2-1. On the contrary, where did he lose? 0-3 loss to City, 0-2 to Porto, 0-1 to Wolves, 0-2 to Bayern, 2-4 to Tottenham, 1-3 to Red Star and 2-3 to PAOK, but also a draw (1- 1) in PAO, Panionios and Giannina.

Nouns Here too, in away games, we see the same thing: Olympiacos basically doubles when it’s zero (there are exceptions that simply confirm the rule). By conceding a goal, in most cases he will lose in Europe and lose in the Greek championship.

So a prisoner: The Olympic he must learn to achieve results even if he admits (one) purpose. It’s absolutely fantastic that he (almost) always wins (as there is 0-0 in several matches) when he doesn’t concede a goal – so he won the cup (1-0 against AEK). And I understand that a team is much more comfortable in its game when it doesn’t eat goals. But it makes no sense in 90% of his toughest matches that he can’t Olympic to win by violating his hearth at least once! He is like another Olympic! I don’t remember if it is a psychological problem, but I know it needs to be addressed in some way. After all, it is mathematically unlikely that you will not score a goal in all (!) His most difficult games. This is not happening!

Second very important conclusion: The Olympic he has to improve aggressively, always when talking about his most difficult games. At the beginning of the article we counted: five tough matches in Karaiskaki, with only two goals and two draws and three defeats. Let’s go to six other away matches, which ended 0-0: with AEK and PAO in OAKA, with Plizen and Omonia in the Czech Republic and Cyprus, but also in Xanthi and Volos.

Look, to o Olympic 2-2 and 2-4 with Tottenham, 2-3 and 0-2 lost to Bayern, but also to Porto 0-2 and City 0-3 even to Wolves 0-1 and PAOK 2-3 in Toumba is on the program . But there are many, many other results that are “not in the program”. And they all have in common that he cannot score (see six white draws and three 1-1).

Now, to the ensuing question of why the goal doesn’t come easier, the answer seems quite simple: why the Olympic especially, so far, this year he gets the goal from a few players, mainly from the center for (El Arabi, Hassan) and second only from Masoura. Last year he scored at least occasionally goals from others: at the start of Semedo (five) and Pontense (five), at the end of Kamaras (seven) and Radzelovic (six) and in between Guillermo (seven) and Sundani. (seven), while also having multiple goals from penalties (Valbouena), for which this year penalties are a forbidden fruit for Olympic– yet the general conclusion then was the same, regarding the inability to score in some of the most difficult games.

What is my opinion: from the moment the Olympic gets goals from a few players, his options are limited. Firstly, it must finally improve more in the established stages and secondly, Fortounis must be deployed more. Of the existing squad, this is the attacking player who has been determined to score the most goals and eliminate the attacker.

Fortounis in his career he has scored 73 goals in nearly six seasons, so he averages 12 goals per season. And this year, without a constant presence of the team, he opened the score for the victory with Asteras and gave the victory with Panathinaikos. And last year, in his most difficult year, through crosses, he caught up at the end, scoring three goals.

The ideal would certainly be that the team will roll again this year, just like last year. And to get goals from almost all players. But the question is when will we see this, in this strangest season in modern football history. And with what we’ve already seen in a large sample of 14 games, I don’t see any solution at this point other than Fortounis stabilization in the starting lineup, which is with rolls as close to the opponent’s area as possible.

Irrelevant: PAOK took its risks in the Netherlands yesterday and was very high against PSV with seven and eight players for 15 minutes.

He was rewarded spectacularly, first with the help of luck (0-1 with a very bad shot from Jolie that would have gone too far out) and then with the help of the referee (the incredible cancellation of the goal as supposedly offside, with the goalscorer covered. two meters !!!), but also a great goal (the 0-2 from Jolis is a product of really great team development, but also of great individual power, by Zifkovic).

However, it turned out that a Greek team does not have the stamina to respond to this level when they press on this level, especially at home – here we saw Olympic after 20 minutes of unbearable pressure on PAO to fall so spectacularly in Karaiskaki last Saturday). PAOK thus had no answers when PSV started to push from his side. He was also unlucky with the quick drop in the score, as the ball went under Zifkovic’s feet, but he was also lucky that it was not equalized at half time.

At the beginning of the second half, the picture was the same, as Garcia did not pay attention to hear the reaction from PSV from 15 μετ. Almost inevitably, 2-2 and 3-2 came in three minutes (51-53). As in five minutes (73-78) he had eaten Krasnodar’s two goals in Toumba …

What we’ve all seen is that the more dangerous Tzolis is up front with his ability to get into the stages, the more dangerous he is in the back with his inability to mark – check out the stages from the first two goals, but another major opportunity as well of the Dutch in α΄ ημίχρονο!

From 3-2, the Orange controlled the game not to risk 3-3, knowing that otherwise the draw with PAOK would have been lost by the 1-4 of Thessaloniki. Of course, one could say that PAOK lost the match in that incredible opportunity to create a stage in the 40 ‘, where four of his forwards had only one defender in front of them (!!!) and yet didn’t take advantage of it, with the bad pass through Kantouri. Going to halftime with a score in favor of 3-1, if nothing else, he would hardly lose.

Still, PAOK will pass, as it now plays with the winless Omonia in Cyprus and the last game in Toumba with Granada, which logically (with the home win against PSV next week) will also be winless. . PAOK will have to commit suicide to be eliminated.




Source link