Evaluation site DxOMark results released Photo effects Samsung Galaxy Note 9 tied up HTC U12 + (137673)



Compared to the HTC U12 +, the Galaxy Note 9 from Samsung has won 1 point for taking photos with a camera, but lost the HTC U12 + in 1 minute of dynamic recording, so the overall evaluation performance is 103 points.

First photo

It was announced in New York last month, and then the Galaxy Note 9 was released for sale. Although the essence of the camera is still based on the Galaxy S9 + introduced at the beginning of the year, coupled with the scene designation of artificial intelligence, the maintenance of the use of two sets of 12 million pixel design is maintained. The main camera model with dual lens captures the foreground image more intelligently.

At DxOMark it was previously announced that it would use camera presets to collect more than 1,500 test photos and more than 2 hours of video content in a laboratory environment with fixed recording conditions and natural scenes indoors and outdoors. Evaluate the camera performance of the Galaxy Note 9.

Galaxy Note 9

In the actual test evaluation of the DxOMark, which shows the performance of the Galaxy Note 9 camera, the previous performance of the Galaxy S9 + camera is finally lower than that of the Huawei P20, but also the HTC U12 + camera performance is outdated in the first half of the year, but still can not Huawei has a Leica lens design with three lenses and a P20 Pro ratio with a handheld night shot of 4 seconds.

Although the overall ratings score only confirms the HTC U12 +, the DxOMark team still has some positive reviews from the Galaxy Note 9 camera, including fast AF performance and a balance between image details and noise development. In addition, the Galaxy Note 9 is also very good in low-light shots. The wide dynamic range does not overexpose the image and the white balance of the image is also excellent.

However, the DxOMark team also pointed out that the camera recording feature of the Galaxy Note 9 has been smeared with some image details to prevent excessive noise in the image, causing some watercolor patterns to appear in some cases.

Has the DxOMark evaluation released Galaxy Note 9 camera finally caught up with the third picture of HTC U12 +

Under the DxOMark review, the camera recording view of the Galaxy Note 9 corresponds to the HTC U12 + introduced by HTC in the first half of this year, but it can also be the P20 Pro that Huawei introduced in the first half of the year ( Figure / 撷 of the DxOMark website) is still not catching up.

Is the evaluation of the DxOMark released Galaxy Note 9 camera finally caught up with the 4th picture of HTC U12 +

In comparison with HTC U12 +, Samsung's Galaxy Note 9 won 1 point in taking pictures with a camera, but lost the HTC U12 + in 1 minute of dynamic recording, so the overall evaluation performance is 103 points (as for HTC) In order of order it must be related to alphabetical order) (Image / 撷 of the DxOMark website)

In terms of the DxOMark scoring method, static images and dynamic photography functions were scored separately and finally calculated in a weighted manner. As far as the Galaxy Note 9-score is concerned, the static image recording section even scored 107 points, although behind Huawei P20 Pro The 1st victory on HTC U12 + was the second place in static recordings, and although the dynamic video performance was also achieved by the DxOMark- team were praised, HTC U12 + was left with 1 point, so the final evaluation score is only the same as HTC U12 +.

The DxOMark team also pointed out that the Galaxy Note 9 is not enough for taking photos, and that sometimes there is inaccurate exposure, and there is flourishing, overlapping and obviously clear detail distortion and the case of extremely dark or very bright. Distortions will occasionally occur, and sometimes the inconsistent determination of white balance occurs in the same scene as the flash is on.

As far as the dynamic video section is concerned, DxOMark believes that the Galaxy Note 9 camera can not capture enough details in the recording process in low light and even produces clear noise. Moreover, there are occasional ghosting and false color situations in open-air scenes.

But overall, the evaluation of the Galaxy Note 9 by the DxOMark team is not too low, and it is even thought that the bokeh recording texture is handled very naturally, and the performance in digital zoom photography is also very good, but in some cases cases unfortunately produce images Detail distortion, moiré, false color and even clearly abnormal folding phenomenon, so a performance assessment has to be deducted.

Has the DxOMark evaluation released Galaxy Note 9 camera finally caught up with the 5th picture of HTC U12 +

When the Galaxy Note 9, P20 Pro and Galaxy S9 + were recorded in an environment with lots of light, the white balance of the Galaqxy Note 9 apparently ran away, making the blue sky a bit warmer, while the white balance of the Galaxy S9 + normal stayed (figure / 撷 DxOMark website)

Is the evaluation of the DxOMark released Galaxy Note 9 camera finally caught up with the 6th photo of HTC U12 +

Compared with the recording details of the zoom lens, the P20 Pro has relatively good performance in detail because of the high resolution of 40 million pixels (image / 撷 of the DxOMark website)

Has the DxOMark evaluation released Galaxy Note 9 camera finally caught up with the 7th photo of HTC U12 +

Different Galaxy Note 9 can cause problems when shooting outdoors: moire, after-image, false colors (image / 撷 of the DxOMark website)

Is the evaluation of the DxOMark released Galaxy Note 9 camera finally caught up with the 8th photo of HTC U12 +

High-quality light shots in low-light environments, the Galaxy Note 9 retains dark details and illuminated screen details, but the P20 Pro results are significantly more distorted, while the Galaxy S9 + can not fully maintain the backlight background data (Figure / 撷 of the DxOMark website)


Source link

Leave a Reply