Case of Alleged Nur Mahmudi Corruption and Politics of Locating PKS

Jakarta, CNN Indonesia – After not being heard, suddenly the figure of the former mayor of Depok Nur Mahmudi Ismail stay back in the universe of the news. Not because he took political steps, but because of a corruption case.

Nur was named a suspect in the alleged bribery case for land acquisition in Depok, West Java. That said, the value of state losses reached about Rp. 10.7 billion. Nur became the second PKS leader who was arrested by Rasuah after Lutfi Hasan Ishaaq was convicted of bribing beef import quotas.

Since the beginning of this case, PKS seemed like the party that overshadowed Nur Mahmudi. In fact, the services of Nur Mahmudi to PKS are quite large.

He was the first PKS president from 1998 to 2000. He was also the Minister of Forestry and Plantations during the leadership of the late Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur).
PKS Vice Chairman of the Syuro Council Hidayat Nur Wahid also did not want to say much about his colleague's case.

"Ah, that's a legal issue," Hidayat said briefly.

From the analysis of political observer Adi Prayitno, in this case, PKS was deliberately forgotten Nur Mahmudi & # 39 ;. According to him, the attitude of PKS towards Nur was more based on political reasons.

Adi explained that there were several factors that were thought to be the reason that PKS distanced itself from the problem of turning Nur Mahmudi. Firstly, he said, it is likely that the case of Nur Mahmudi is regarded by PKS as a purely private matter.

"It seems that the PKS does not want to intervene in Nur Mahmhdi's lawsuit, the PKS wants to locate the case as the personal affair of Nur Mahmudi who has nothing to do with the party," Adi told, Saturday (1/9).

According to Adi, PKS's attitude was to preserve the image. He considered that PKS did not want to be dragged back after a number of cadres were captured in a case.

"This is important to do in order to keep cases of corruption out of any intervention," he said.

In addition, said Adi, PKS might want to maintain its political vision before the 2019 presidential election. Adi said PKS did not want to defame his image because of corruption cases.

"This is done by the PKS to avoid the electoral burden in the political year and moreover PKS is currently in good and clean execution because there are hardly any frameworks that are netted out by corruption cases," he said.

In addition, Adi PKS considered adopting such an attitude because it wanted to concentrate on increasing its freedom of choice in the forthcoming parliamentary elections. The PKS is making a lot of effort to reach seats in parliament.

"PKS seems to want to focus on the legislative and presidential elections without thinking about political events that burden the PKS image. PKK is currently struggling to pass parliament and win the presidential election," Adi said.

Political observer Emrus Sihombing said there were at least two predictions about why PKS was reluctant to help Nur Mahmudi in a corruption case. First, Emrus said it could be because Nur Mahmudi was in a different faction than the current PKS leadership.

"If in theory the name is another faction, if it could be a stronghold in real terms, it could be that my hypothesis is that Nur Mahmudi is a different camp than the current leadership," Emrus said.

Emrus explained that the factions in each party were natural. Everywhere in the world there are different factions in each party, including PKS.

"Well, that's why it's logical that PKS is reluctant to help, this is actually who is in power," he said.

According to Emrus, the second hypothesis is that PKS implements a localized theory. Corruption is a private matter and not an organization's behavior.

"Corruption, good, individual behavior is not part of the factual responsibility of the party," he said.

In addition, said Emrus, Nur Mahmudi allegedly committed corruption while he was mayor of Depok. Therefore, regardless of the decision of a framework during serving, it is purely personal responsibility.

"The time is right, well, he already has his framework authorized to serve, so there are no party cases," Emrus explained.

Finally, Emrus emphasized that it was appropriate for the party not to offer assistance to cadres. If there is a party that offers help to cadres that are suspected of corruption, this can cause a bad image at the party.

"Because it is necessary to emphasize that the party does not belong to the government or cadres or the board. The party belongs to all nations and people, so the party must be responsible to the public," he said. (AYP)

Source link

Leave a Reply