The children's hospital of Our Lady, Crumlin, has offered a few apologies for shortcomings in the care provided to them, including the provision of an incorrect genetic report.
The couple continued the hospital and the HSE for nervous shock in procedures focused on genetic screening and chromosomal abnormalities involving two of their children.
On Tuesday, the judge of the High Court, Mr. Justice Kevin Cross, was told that things could be deleted because confidentiality had been reached.
Dr. John O & # 39; Mahony SC, for the couple, read an apology letter to the couple of the hospital chief, Seán Walsh.
"I would like to repeat once again the apology contained in the evaluation report of 4 August 2017, to you and to your family for the events that took place in August 2010 when an incorrect genetic report was issued to you and for the misery caused," it stated . "The hospital unconditionally declares its sincere apology for the shortcomings in the care provided."
The woman was a patient at the National Center for Medical Genetics at the hospital. She gave birth in 2010 to a baby that survived for 18 months with multiple birth defects.
The woman later bore two sons without chromosomal abnormalities, but another girl died an hour after her birth in 2014.
It was claimed that it was only after the birth and death of the second girl and the subsequent tests that there was a chromosomal situation that made the pair susceptible to recurrence of the abnormality.
The court heard that the couple had not been informed of the increased risk of a repeat. It was further claimed that in 2010 around the time of the birth of their first daughter was failed to perform the correct chromosomal examination of the couple.
It was claimed that a proper screening procedure at this time would have established the risk level of congenital abnormalities for future pregnancies and that an increased risk should have been reported to the couple.
Furthermore, they claimed that no reasonable care had been given to or performing appropriate examinations regarding the chromosomal abnormalities that occurred with regard to the birth of their two daughters.
The couple claimed that they had serious mental problems and that there was a failure to advise about the increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities after their first daughter died.
A dereliction of duty was admitted in connection with performing genetic screening on the pair in 2010, but all other claims were refused.