Society: Society: News: Hankyoreh



"Abolition of the trust office and exclusion of the judge from the standing committee"
Decision of the 10th extraordinary session … & # 39; Warning & # 39; mean for the administration

<img src = "http://img.hani.co.kr/imgdb/resize/2018/0910/00503128_20180910.JPG" style = "width: 640px;" title = "Supreme Court of Seoul from. <한겨레> Article photo "alt =" Supreme Court of Seoul of. <한겨레> Item photo "/>

Supreme Court of Seoul Seocho – gu. Article photo & # 39; s

A separate judicial administrative restructuring mechanism, involving external members, is needed for a national judicial representative (chairman Choi Gye-sang, judge of the court in the northern district of Seoul). Judge Yang Seung-tae, the supreme court of the Supreme Court, revealed the behavior of the peasants in the judiciary, but even when the Supreme Court and the administrative office of the Court showed a passive attitude towards reforms,
The court conference held an extraordinary session on 10 October at the Goyang Judicial and Training Institute in Gyeonggi Province and said: "It is necessary to review the existing legal governance structure to prevent abuse by the court and to ensure the independence of judges faithfully It is necessary to have a separate promotion mechanism in which the judge's recommendation and external members participate in the reorganization. "An official of the court said:" It is desirable to To pursue separate committee (administrative reform) to participate in the judicial council, which is the representative body, and the external committee, on how some reforms can be the subject of reform, "he said.
The court conference is held in a concrete manner as follows: △ Abolition of the administrative office △ Decision of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court, decision-making executive committee, decision-making decision on judicial policy and judicial administration △ Separation of personnel and property between the Supreme Court and the executive agency △ Exclusion and establishment of a judicial review committee. It is similar to the suggestion of the Judicial Development Committee (former judge of Supreme Court Lee Hong-hoon)
Kim Myung-soo, president of the Supreme Court, who has introduced the "change and reform of the judiciary", has been in office for about a year now, but there are no indications that the constitution of the administrative office, Chief Justice Kim, has the Justice and Development Committee set up in April to discuss the improvement of the system for the implementation of judicial administration on the basis of a process. However, most recommendations from the committee have not yet been realized.
In particular, the "Committee for the Judiciary", which decided in July to set up the business, the Commission was noted as a mechanism for administrative and judicial powers, including staff and budget monopolized by the Chief Justice, to divide over a transparent and horizontal decision – The administration, however, did not give a clear statement and said: "I will go through the process to collect internal opinions."
One judge said: "Even if the committee proposes an important issue, it is said that the administration will do it, I doubt that there is nothing to do, I doubt the will to reform." Another judge also said: "The current administrative director of the Supreme Court is the head of the Special Investigation Team, which comes to the conclusion that there is no serious crime with regard to the Jury, I do not know if it is appropriate to have the administrative structures reformed, "he said. For this reason there are consistent notions within and outside the courtroom that external administrative supervision and control are necessary, instead of entrusting administrative reforms to the administration.
Kim Min Kyung reporter [email protected]


Source link

Leave a Reply