Kuchinsky denies allegations of disclosure of information in the Klevin case of a deputy



Vaivars emphasized that no statement on this point is justified and must be regarded as an element of the pre-election campaign.

It has already been written that the prosecution refused to initiate criminal proceedings in July in connection with the alleged disclosure of information in the Klavina case, at the request of the investigator of the Corruption Prevention and Control Office (KNAB). The Office has started a criminal case against the deputy of the Saeima Klavin for abuse of a state of service for a gracious purpose.

According to the information available to the LETA agency, the KNAB investigator sent a request to the Attorney General Ēriks Kalnmeiers in May about the fact that, in his opinion, the disclosure of information obtained from the criminal proceedings prior to the lawsuit was side of Kuchinsky took place. The case was only publicly announced on June 21, when the Saeima decided to agree to shake off the whereabouts of a member.

Chief Public Prosecutor of the Office for Extraordinary General Affairs of the public prosecutor's office, Modris Adlers, has ensured via the Public Relations Specialist of the Attorney General, Unas Reke, that information about the possible publication of the criminal prosecution by the KNAB-department Attorney General was received from the initiator of this case.

More comments on the content of the information can not be provided because it is classified, Adler explains. He pointed out, however, that the verification of information was carried out in the interest of investigating this specific criminal procedure, which examined the disclosure of possible information to third parties.

After the audit was completed, a decision was taken on 2 July to refuse to initiate criminal proceedings on the basis of the absence of the composition of the crime provided for in Article 318 (2) of Criminal Law and Article 304. These articles of the criminal legislation provides for liability for abuse of office and for the disclosure of information obtained in criminal proceedings prior to the trial.

The deputy of the city council of Riga, former deputy head of the KNAB, Juta Strīķe (JKP), wrote in the social network tonight that she had news that points to a crime "committed by Kuchinsky, with the help of the head of the KNAB Jēkabs Straume, warning his party member, Kļaviņš, about the criminal case starting the planned procedural steps, warning the suspect and allowing him to destroy the evidence and at the expense of the investigation ". Strikė did not comment on his statement.

The Latvian television broadcast "De facto" last Sunday reminded that at a time when the Saeima in June decided to allow the KNAB to search in Klavin's hometown and in a car, he himself debated the stage and said that he had heard rumors that such a thing would be. The MP also confirmed to journalists, stating that he had received an anonymous message that warned him that he would have trouble.

Asked about what really "problems" means, and whether they could come from the KNAB, Klavins stated at the time that it was not written there, but the text message was refused to journalists.

"De facto" reported that the Head of the KNAB, Straume, had no suspicion of leakage of information from the Kļaviņš office.

Likewise, the possibility that a member would be warned of an ongoing investigation was new to the Attorney General, Ērik Kalnmeier, so he claimed "de facto". "I can not answer, I'm not informed, I'm hearing this for the first time about this text message, because you have to ask KNAB, but I think there is no damage or consequences for anyone," he said. .

The one who would have been criticized by MP Klavin, a member of his representative, without knowing the KNAB's overseer – Kucinsky. "I have no information, I got as much as I felt at that moment that some intrigues were going on, but no, no," he told the program.

Kuchinsky, however, acknowledged that he received information about nationally important matters for others, but denied that it caused leakage risks, for example from the main office, because he was in one-to-one contact with the heads of institutions.


Source link

Leave a Reply