It suffices to think about the following equation to know the priorities and interests of the people: President Bashir Gemayel, who formed a divisional title in his partisan life, returned and formed the title of collector in his few days. Why?
The martyr, Bashir Gemayel, was the spearhead of the political cause of the case in which he believed. This made the situation very clear: with him or with the case for which he fought, against him and against the case he was carrying, She made sorting easy between those with him to love and to him to hatred and hatred.
The question that begs and asks is: How did Bashir Gemayel succeed in breaking the barriers of hatred against him and fearing his project when he was elected president?
The president, martyr, and with his election, did not change his ideas and did not retire from his goals and did not change his project, and it was therefore assumed that he remained divided over his person between him and those who opposed him, but the situation was completely different after his election for the following reasons:
First, because the people in his speech touched on the logic of the majority and the reports and victorious and defeated and that his election is a victory for the Lebanese class over the other, but saw in all the headlines launched by the effects of reassuring her future in this country.
Secondly, because people were tired of the war and the wolves and atrocities and the devastation it left behind in stone and people after seven years ate the green and the country, Bashir's election saw as an opportunity to make war happen. end and restore peace and stability.
Thirdly, because people were hungry for the state, the constitution, the law, the institutions, the order and the order. In the president-elect's speech, he found what he said about her and reflected her aspirations, hopes and ambitions in the return of the state it thought was irreversible.
Fourth, because people have not long been accustomed to a comprehensive political discourse that focuses on the participant and distances oneself from the other, concentrates on the diary and his worries and economic, financial and social pains, and did not see in his speech. blank promises or words of expression, but saw determination and determination to convey them from the tragic reality that It is a completely different reality.
Fifth, because people from the time of President Fuad Shehab have saved that the cheese eaters are stronger than the state and will eat and spoil. Lebanon's problem is the corruption that caused a big gap between the citizen and the state. And the creation of the desired state.
Sixth, because people saw and touched the violence of the Bashir and his strength and his impulse and determination, the actual opportunity to maintain the state and the rule of law and institutions. The rule is prestige and unless every citizen inside and outside the country believes that his roof is the law and that exceeding this ceiling will expose him to responsibility and accountability, it will not be good and there will be no country.
With the election of Bashir, people felt the return of prestige to the state with all its institutions and institutions. I also felt sure that Bashir was the one who inspired his speech and tone with that long-lost trust, and I knew for sure what he said was able to execute it.
It was 20 days and enough day to prove three basic problems:
The first is that the Lebanese people are able to overcome their divisions and differences when they are given priority in their affairs and to guarantee their security, stability, freedom and democracy. People want to live in dignity, freedom and equality before the law, and one of the reasons for leaving the state lies in the fact that the state is abandoning them.
The second point is that Lebanon is not a failed state and that failure is not the fate of the Lebanese, but the problem is that nobody is in charge of the decision, the direction and the will to make Lebanon a successful state. There is no successful and failed state for reasons of inheritance or composition, but failure or success is linked to the will of the people to make its experience a success. The Lebanese and expatriate people have proven successes and achievements, but the structural imbalance lies in the succession of responsibility and responsibility.
The third point is that what has been achieved with the elected president is no longer an exception: the martyred president did no miracles, but he spoke with spontaneity, sincerity, violence and sincerity with three basic addresses: a strong and friendly country on its territory, especially law ;
Bashir al-Gemayel is not a dream, but a fact that the Lebanese people have been through during his election, this fact can be repeated with every president who decides to fight corruption, not by words, and makes the law on the top and second place, and prevents bribery, bribery and liability.
There is nothing to do with this issue, but with one thing: the existence of a political decision to establish a state, and no one can stand in his face, but it can embarrass anyone, and regional or controversial considerations come naturally when there is someone who gives people their clear rights.
The current situation can be the most favorable situation because people are united by the shit of everything, traffic congestion, lack of employment, economic hardship, corruption, nepotism, waste and pollution … and when there is someone who has the prestige, the confidence and inspires the hope of people.
Those who believe that the experience of August 23, 1982 will not be repeated, President Bashir martyr said nothing unusual, but spoke the same familiar and his speech more than clear and should be the rule and no exception, and if the experience was an exception, this experiment will be repeated, to collect. And life.