Military service in Morocco: the young, this unloved



SOCIETY – Mandatory military service. What to think? What about the blow of an announcement rolled up in the middle of summer indolent? It is said that 300,000 young people each year will get the big mute to win in justice, in discipline, in patriotism. The long-awaited awakening, that of employment, of dignity, of redistribution, the federal myth that will bring a wave of energy into the sails of a Morocco boat, is there and it is … alas, borrowing from the past .

It does not belong to anyone to deflate the idealistic bubble of ideas designers. After all, an event of this magnitude, federated in its contours, revolutionary in its desire to stimulate social mixing, is not the daily bread of our country. Perhaps this project will rekindle the dormant energies of our youth as soft, tolerant, violent, badly channeled, bad in its skin, susceptible to roaming.

But we are talking about compulsory military service. We are talking about outsourcing to a professional army of the management of the Millenials, the demographic dividend, the only wealth of the nation. We are talking here about supplying the youth without any differentiation to a strong hierarchical value system, which effectively establishes iron authority as the highest value, submission and obedience as unashamed laws.

Discipline of a youngster's beret to find, in addition to algorithms, artificial intelligence, the new knowledge economy that is the only fuel that has the ability to overcome conformism, norms of the past, limits of thought, create a future where 60 % of current jobs disappear, is at best anachronistic, at worst a terrible mess.

Admittedly, this national duty lasts only one year and the stigmata, even if alive, will decay (or not) with time, but the use of army supervision in the moral, physical, intellectual recovery of youth sounds like a correction mode "Full Metal Jacket". It sounds like the replacement for a real Millenial integration policy. Because the idea of ​​a bootcamp is preferred by the state, why would these bootcamps not look like a citizen service aimed at digital learning in the way of 1337 school? oasis in the desert of education that OCP grafted in the mining town of Khouribga? Young people selected according to a logic, without the discrimination of a diploma, practice coding on the model of school 42 of Xavier Niel. Guaranteed availability, openness to the other, to the world and to its nuclear reactor: Palo Alto.

As the founding element of the infantile, imaginary adolescent, the army no longer dreams. Twenty-five years of peace, a world radically transformed, digitized, connected, collaborative, creative, reprogrammed the psyche of the young. These, subject to what Luc Ferry & # 39; revolutionary individualism & # 39; calls, now dreams of entrepreneurship, work labs, hackhaton. He rejects wage labor and his archaisms, the schedules & # 39; s and their corset, the orders that are distilled by a fifty-year-old hierarchy that is not aware of the new codes of the collaborative economy. For the first time in history, the transmission is no longer done vertically, the smallest student of a large company has more to learn from the CEO than the opposite. Subjecting Generation Y to a forced national duty, strange to the concept of volunteering, convincing devotion, can bring about rejection and discomfort.

In 2006, when the first military service ended, Steve Jobs had not yet made the iPhone and neither Facebook nor Twitter, nor Uber, nor Airbnb were born. Since then, the world has evolved into a dimension where the notion of stable employment no longer applies to the fragmentation of work, in front of what is called the "gig economy". This real anthropological Big Bang, seated on absolute and inalienable freedom, is at the forefront of the military tradition, symbol of an old, layered world, where obedience, respect is not won, but is imposed. But it is for this world that we want to propel the youngsters again, these eternal misunderstandings.

If we can find ways to feed, dress and transfer knowledge to 300,000 young people who have been torn out of their family cocoon (we speak of 40 MMDH per year or 4% of GDP), we can only do this for a few months, without the trajectory of a life and at lower budget costs, armed for the digital economy by not equipping them with trellis, but with Mac, teaching them not the use of weapons, but of the soft and hard skills of the future, by cultivating them teach the humanities, science and history and languages.

This is how they will find their place among the innovations of tomorrow, so perhaps they will imagine the innovations of tomorrow, not by repeating such machines: "chief yes leader", the back of the hand welded to a damp forehead of fear . To send the youngster back to the past is to ignore him, to think that his unemployment, his apathy, his detachment are his, is to avoid questioning the anti-emancipation, culturophobic policies that have thus been reduced to crouching the facades of decrepit buildings by turning the joint, it is in fact to blame him for being bad, his evils, his torments.

It is bad to know him.

It is bad to love him …


Source link

Military service in Morocco: the young, this unloved



SOCIETY – Mandatory military service. What to think? What about the blow of an announcement rolled up in the middle of summer indolent? It is said that 300,000 young people each year will get the big mute to win in justice, in discipline, in patriotism. The long-awaited awakening, that of employment, of dignity, of redistribution, the federal myth that will bring a wave of energy into the sails of a Morocco boat, is there and it is … alas, borrowing from the past .

It does not belong to anyone to deflate the idealistic bubble of ideas designers. After all, an event of this magnitude, federated in its contours, revolutionary in its desire to stimulate social mixing, is not the daily bread of our country. Perhaps this project will rekindle the dormant energies of our youth as soft, tolerant, violent, badly channeled, bad in its skin, susceptible to roaming.

But we are talking about compulsory military service. We are talking about outsourcing to a professional army of the management of the Millenials, the demographic dividend, the only wealth of the nation. We are talking here about supplying the youth without any differentiation to a strong hierarchical value system, which effectively establishes iron authority as the highest value, submission and obedience as unashamed laws.

Discipline of a youngster's beret to find, in addition to algorithms, artificial intelligence, the new knowledge economy that is the only fuel that has the ability to overcome conformism, norms of the past, limits of thought, create a future where 60 % of current jobs disappear, is at best anachronistic, at worst a terrible mess.

Admittedly, this national duty lasts only one year and the stigmata, even if alive, will decay (or not) with time, but the use of army supervision in the moral, physical, intellectual recovery of youth sounds like a correction mode "Full Metal Jacket". It sounds like the replacement for a real Millenial integration policy. Because the idea of ​​a bootcamp is preferred by the state, why would these bootcamps not look like a citizen service aimed at digital learning in the way of 1337 school? oasis in the desert of education that OCP grafted in the mining town of Khouribga? Young people selected according to a logic, without the discrimination of a diploma, practice coding on the model of school 42 of Xavier Niel. Guaranteed availability, openness to the other, to the world and to its nuclear reactor: Palo Alto.

As the founding element of the infantile, imaginary adolescent, the army no longer dreams. Twenty-five years of peace, a world radically transformed, digitized, connected, collaborative, creative, reprogrammed the psyche of the young. These, subject to what Luc Ferry & # 39; revolutionary individualism & # 39; calls, now dreams of entrepreneurship, work labs, hackhaton. He rejects wage labor and his archaisms, the schedules & # 39; s and their corset, the orders that are distilled by a fifty-year-old hierarchy that is not aware of the new codes of the collaborative economy. For the first time in history, the transmission is no longer done vertically, the smallest student of a large company has more to learn from the CEO than the opposite. Subjecting Generation Y to a forced national duty, strange to the concept of volunteering, convincing devotion, can bring about rejection and discomfort.

In 2006, when the first military service ended, Steve Jobs had not yet made the iPhone and neither Facebook nor Twitter, nor Uber, nor Airbnb were born. Since then, the world has evolved into a dimension where the notion of stable employment no longer applies to the fragmentation of work, in front of what is called the "gig economy". This real anthropological Big Bang, seated on absolute and inalienable freedom, is at the forefront of the military tradition, symbol of an old, layered world, where obedience, respect is not won, but is imposed. But it is for this world that we want to propel the youngsters again, these eternal misunderstandings.

If we can find ways to feed, dress and transfer knowledge to 300,000 young people who have been torn out of their family cocoon (we speak of 40 MMDH per year or 4% of GDP), we can only do this for a few months, without the trajectory of a life and at lower budget costs, armed for the digital economy by not equipping them with trellis, but with Mac, teaching them not the use of weapons, but of the soft and hard skills of the future, by cultivating them teach the humanities, science and history and languages.

This is how they will find their place among the innovations of tomorrow, so perhaps they will imagine the innovations of tomorrow, not by repeating such machines: "chief yes leader", the back of the hand welded to a damp forehead of fear . To send the youngster back to the past is to ignore him, to think that his unemployment, his apathy, his detachment are his, is to avoid questioning the anti-emancipation, culturophobic policies that have thus been reduced to crouching the facades of decrepit buildings by turning the joint, it is in fact to blame him for being bad, his evils, his torments.

It is bad to know him.

It is bad to love him …


Source link

Leave a Reply