Home / Entertainment / Disney & # 39; Lion King & # 39; Remake needs more than a new cast and a new paint job to govern the Box Office

Disney & # 39; Lion King & # 39; Remake needs more than a new cast and a new paint job to govern the Box Office




<div _ngcontent-c14 = "" innerhtml = "

Yes, Simba is just very happy that he is dragged out of bed and hoisted over the edge of a cliff by a total unknown …Walt Disney

Walt Disney used an important Thanksgiving Day football game to drop the first trailer for their "live-action" version of The lionking. Directed by Jon Favreau (who did a similar trick with The Jungle Book valued at $ 363 million domestic and $ 966 million worldwide in 2016) and starring a cast to die for (Donald Glover, Beyonc & Knowles-Carter and Chewitel Ejiofor among others), was the first teaser trailer of the film a happy medium between Disney's recent "show nothing" teasers before Aladdin and Mary Poppins Returns and a conventional teaser trailer. It also recorded 224 million online views in the first 24 hours, making it the second-most-viewed trailer of all time The (197 million) and Avengers: Infinity War (238 million). So, yes, even if people reject the idea of ​​calling a CGI animated function "live action" (because it is meant to approach real life as opposed to a conventional animated function, it becomes a monster of a box office when it is opened on July 19, 2019.

But how big is & # 39; big & # 39; Curiosity and IP-specific interest will open people in the opening weekend. Assuming that it approaches the emotional melodrama and epic range of the original by Roger Allers and Rob Minkoff (which earned $ 322 million in the domestic way in 1994), it will be a huge hit in July. The 1994 film has, after all, sold more tickets in North America than any animated function 101 dalmatiers and Snowwhite and the Seven Dwarfs. With the proviso that there are no plausible "bad" scenarios for this, unless it turns out to be horribly horrible, how well it performs after the opening weekend (I will argue) will depend on one specific thing. Are the fans of the original animated feature of 1994 something new to enjoy, in addition to seeing their favorite animated classic that has been put up with a new layer of paint and a new vocal cast?

The first theatrical trailer has made it look like this is a shot-by-shot recreation of the original film, similar to Gus Van Sant's psychopath& Nbsp; remake& Nbsp;that was opened just 20 years ago. But that's marketing, which at the moment is meant to remind you how much you loved the original movie, while you also floated with iconic moments (much of it happened during the iconic Circle of Life & # 39; – series) appearing in something that resembled a photo -realistic "live action." This first teaser saves you with the familiar. If there are new wrinkles that go beyond just the vocal cast that can be found, it is for later trailers (or surprises in the theater). Because you say what you want about the Disney action for live action over the past few years, they have not always supported pure nostalgia. For better or worse, they have made films that stood next to the animated originals. They have at least some unique experiences offered.

pernicious has told it again Sleeping Beauty myth from the villain's point of view while the story got a "feminism versus patriarchy" shine that resonated beyond just the idea to see Angelina Jolie vampire as the title character. Cinderella gave shadow and empathy to Cinderella's step sisters and stepmother (a winning Cate Blanchett) as he developed a convincing courtship between Cinderella and Prince Charming. Pete & # 39; s Dragon basically offered a fantastic new take that played like "Mom for children "while they exist in the artistic wheelhouse of David Lowery. Beauty and the beast tried to "modernize" Belle and gave us a movie star in the lead (Emma Watson), new plot twists and more contextual background story. The Jungle Book offered a nocturnal experience from the 1967 comic strip while retaining a certain source confession. We can discuss whether these changes helped or painfully helped, but they created something relatively new to distinguish themselves from the animated source material.

The changes, changes or new stories allowed people see Beauty and the beast or pernicious to feel as if they were seeing those specific films for the first time, what they were of course. Conversely, a shot-by-recording remake of The lionking can very well create an experience of d & eacute; j & agrave; vu. This can result in a singular viewing of an experience that is at least as interesting as psychopath in terms of a film school experiment. But if you already feel that you see it The lionking for the second, third or fourth time when you see this new version in the cinema, repeating viewers are not encouraged, even among the target groups. It is a unique challenge to convince families to earn money for tickets and concessions to see a live action version of a movie they've probably bought on VHS, DVD and / or Blu-ray in the last 25 years.

You can certainly convince them to take a look at the big screen, as was the case in 2011 (although at a time when more people were going to the movies to go to the movies), but not two or three times unless it offers something that is unquestionably unique, more than just seeing an old piece with a new cast. The most important variable is whether this new version of The lionking qualifies as new and a unique theatrical experience that goes beyond nostalgia or IP familiarity. If Favreau and friends offer more than just a new wave variation on Gus Van Sant & # 39; s psychopath (which is still fascinating as a one-off experiment), then the air is the limit. But if the public comes here Lion King and feel that they have already seen it The lionking would have to settle for "most" of the money instead of "all" the money.

The lionking, starring Donald Glover (Simba), Chiwetel Ejiofor (Scar), James Earl Jones (Mufasa, again), Beyonce (Nala), Eric Andre (Ed de Hyena), Seth Rogen (Pumba), Bily Eichner (Timon) , Florence Kasumba (Shenzi), Keegan-Michael Key (Banzai), John Kani (Rafiki), John Oliver (Zazu), Alfre Woodard (Sarabi) and JD McCary (young Simba), opens July 19, 2019. The long-term success will partially orphans determined, to paraphrase his best song, in his ability to deliver things to see that have never been seen, and things to find that have never been found. & nbsp; At least the young Simba looks cute, and his expression mimics perfectly after 25 years of domestic cats that are pissed off by their owners who make their own Rakifi impressions. If I were a cat, I would hate & # 39; & # 39; The lionking.

">

Yes, Simba is just very happy that he is dragged out of bed and hoisted over the edge of a cliff by a total unknown …Walt Disney

Walt Disney used an important Thanksgiving Day football game to drop the first trailer for their "live-action" version of The lionking. Directed by Jon Favreau (who did a similar trick with The Jungle Book valued at $ 363 million domestic and $ 966 million worldwide in 2016) and starring a cast (Donald Glover, Beyoncé Knowles-Carter and Chewitel Ejiofor among others), was the first teaser trailer of the film a happy medium between Disney's recent "show" nothing "teasers for." Aladdin and Mary Poppins Returns and a conventional teaser trailer. It also recorded 224 million online views in the first 24 hours, making it the second-most-viewed trailer of all time The (197 million) and Avengers: Infinity War (238 million). So, yes, even if people reject the idea of ​​calling a CGI animated function "live action" (because it is meant to approach real life as opposed to a conventional animated function, it becomes a monster of a box office when it is opened on July 19, 2019.

But how big is & # 39; big & # 39; Curiosity and IP-specific interest will open people in the opening weekend. Assuming that it approaches the emotional melodrama and epic range of the original by Roger Allers and Rob Minkoff (which earned $ 322 million in the domestic way in 1994), it will be a huge hit in July. The 1994 film has, after all, sold more tickets in North America than any animated function 101 dalmatiers and Snowwhite and the Seven Dwarfs. With the proviso that there are no plausible "bad" scenarios for this, unless it turns out to be horribly horrible, how well it performs after the opening weekend (I will argue) will depend on one specific thing. Are the fans of the original animated feature of 1994 something new to enjoy, in addition to seeing their favorite animated classic that has been put up with a new layer of paint and a new vocal cast?

The first theatrical trailer has made it look like this is a shot-by-shot recreation of the original film, similar to Gus Van Sant's psychopath new version that was opened just 20 years ago. But that's marketing, which at the moment is meant to remind you how much you loved the original movie, while you also floated with iconic moments (much of it happened during the iconic Circle of Life & # 39; – series) appearing in something that resembled a photo -realistic "live action." This first teaser saves you with the familiar. If there are new wrinkles that go beyond just the vocal cast that can be found, it is for later trailers (or surprises in the theater). Because you say what you want about the Disney action for live action over the past few years, they have not always supported pure nostalgia. For better or worse, they have made films that stood next to the animated originals. They have at least some unique experiences offered.

pernicious has told it again Sleeping Beauty myth from the villain's point of view while the story got a "feminism versus patriarchy" shine that resonated beyond just the idea to see Angelina Jolie vampire as the title character. Cinderella gave shadow and empathy to Cinderella's step sisters and stepmother (a winning Cate Blanchett) as he developed a convincing courtship between Cinderella and Prince Charming. Pete & # 39; s Dragon basically offered a fantastic new take that played like "Mom for children "while they exist in the artistic wheelhouse of David Lowery. Beauty and the beast tried to "modernize" Belle and gave us a movie star in the lead (Emma Watson), new plot twists and more contextual background story. The Jungle Book offered a nocturnal experience from the 1967 comic strip while retaining a certain source confession. We can discuss whether these changes helped or painfully helped, but they created something relatively new to distinguish themselves from the animated source material.

The changes, changes or new stories allowed people see Beauty and the beast or pernicious to feel as if they were seeing those specific films for the first time, what they were of course. Conversely, a shot-by-recording remake of The lionking can very well create an experience of déjà vu. This can result in a singular viewing of an experience that is at least as interesting as psychopath in terms of a film school experiment. But if you already feel that you see it The lionking for the second, third or fourth time when you see this new version in the cinema, repeating viewers are not encouraged, even among the target groups. It is a unique challenge to convince families to earn money for tickets and concessions to see a live action version of a movie they've probably bought on VHS, DVD and / or Blu-ray in the last 25 years.

You can certainly convince them to take a look at the big screen, as was the case in 2011 (although at a time when more people were going to the movies to go to the movies), but not two or three times unless it offers something that is unquestionably unique, more than just seeing an old piece with a new cast. The most important variable is whether this new version of The lionking qualifies as new and a unique theatrical experience that goes beyond nostalgia or IP familiarity. If Favreau and friends offer more than just a new wave variation on Gus Van Sant & # 39; s psychopath (which is still fascinating as a one-off experiment), then the air is the limit. But if the public comes here Lion King and feel that they have already seen it The lionking would have to settle for "most" of the money instead of "all" the money.

The lionking, starring Donald Glover (Simba), Chiwetel Ejiofor (Scar), James Earl Jones (Mufasa, again), Beyonce (Nala), Eric Andre (Ed de Hyena), Seth Rogen (Pumba), Bily Eichner (Timon) , Florence Kasumba (Shenzi), Keegan-Michael Key (Banzai), John Kani (Rafiki), John Oliver (Zazu), Alfre Woodard (Sarabi) and JD McCary (young Simba), opens July 19, 2019. The long-term success will partially orphans determined, to paraphrase his best song, in his ability to deliver things to see that have never been seen, and things to find that have never been found. At least the young Simba looks cute, and his expression mimics perfectly after 25 years of domestic cats that are pissed off by their owners who make their own Rakifi impressions. If I were a cat, I would hate & # 39; & # 39; The lionking.


Source link