In the statement to PAP Sabina Zalewska she said that "the author
article formulates allegations, based on posted on the site
www.sabinazalewska.pl sketches, based on which
scientific articles printed in permanent sources were made, i.e.
academic journals and collective works. "
She reported that "the final versions of the disputed articles, which
they appeared in the aforementioned sources, they are not identical from
sketch on the page they can contain errors
"All articles published in the journals have been reviewed by
editorial teams composed of scientific authorities in a certain field,
while in collective work they were subject to prior examination by
internal evaluators of a particular publishing house "- wrote Zalewska.
"Anna Golus compared the items she asked for
Internet publications that in turn are made on the basis of the same
printed publications, to which I refer in my articles
required by rules, quotation in scientific publications, relevant footnotes "
– She added. "There is no justification for plagiarism in this case" –
Sabina Lucyna Zalewska reported that she was from the office of the current ombudsman
The child was informed by the information that a group was formed and served there
collecting materials that have them discredit her
context of her candidacy for the position of the RPD.
"I declare with full force that the previous, current and possible next
engineered materials that can appear in me
public space, my decision to walk will not change
position of the children's ombudsman ", she emphasized.
From information obtained by PAP in the Information and Promotion Office UKSW in
Warsaw shows that in the case of Sabina Zalewska "typical procedures were initiated,
what do they take against such accusations as plagiarism? on
the request from the authorities of the university was referred to the ombudsman
disciplinary for researchers "- was given to PAP.
"Tygodnik Powszechny": Sabina Zalewska, PiS candidate for the Children's Ombudsman, is a plagiarism
Supported by Law and Justice candidate for a new one Ombudsman for childrenAlthough she has not yet taken a position, she arouses emotions. Initially it was about controversial views Sabina Zalewska for raising children and publications in which the educator and worker of the UKSW allow the use corporal punishment. For her they are an element of building the authority of the parents, a proof of their love. He also claims that the causes of violence in the family can also lie with children, especially those difficult, crippled …
An article about this appeared in Tygodnik Powszechny. The text had to go over controversial views. Nobody expected that checking the accuracy of offers From the publication of your teacher, the search engine guides the editors to websites Ściąga.pl, or Bryk.pl. It turned out that Zalewska's publications … were a compilation of extensive fragments of other people's works.
And so: the text "Between the rights of the child and the pajdokracją" largely overlaps with the publication of authorship Wanda Papugowa. Article on "Help as a special dialogue of the educator and the pupil in the pedagogy of Fr. Jana Bosko" contains many excerpts from texts Fr .. Kazimierz Misiaszka SDB, priest Zenon Klawikowski SDB, Janusz Leśniewski and priest Jarosław Wąsowicz, SDB. Of course we are not talking about quotes here, only about occasional pages, and sometimes "only" half, fragments of copied articles, not included in offers and without footnotes, given as yours – Tygodnik Powszechny writes.
The newspaper also looked at the publication entitled "A parent in the role of mediator." In the form of a PDF, the version of this text has 10.5 pages, of which about 10 pages are plagiarized. Zalewska used it and used it of three texts posted on the internet: "Conflicts in the family" by Magdalena Żebrowska, "The process of family mediation – from theory to practice" by Hanna Przybyła-Basisty and "Hierarchy and roles in the family" by Marta Pociechy. These texts were published on the web prior to the publication of Zalewska's article, so it is not possible for their authors to copy parts of the physician's publication. " – emphasizes TP.
In the case of Dr. Zalewska there is no mention of the use of the right to quote. According to copyright must explain the quotation, emphasize the statements in the work. A number after they have been deleted he would stay a song. In the case of the text "Parent in the role of mediator": the first three lines come from the text of Pociechy, the next three are from Zalewska himself, there are four pages from the text of Żebrowska, four from Przybyła-Basisty, one paragraph by the author, one and a half Pociechy and finally 4, 5 lines by the person who signed the whole.
Of the publications that Zalewska – conductor in the CSWU classes in the didactics of ethics – are dignified and worth the corresponding risk, texts have also been published on Wikipedia and on the site Bryk.pl – Tygodnik Powszechny writes. And he adds that Sabina Zalewska, when she pressed them, also painted someone's faults (for example "this" instead of "this").
When preparing an article with the title "Academic teacher today, hope and expectations" the site used Ściąga.pl. Yes, this time she let me know about it in footnotes, but she tweeted it rather involuntarily. For example, you can read that "a student in the classroom through the media can see authentic African organisms in their natural environment".
Tygodnik Powszechny asked Sabina Zalewska to comment plea for plagiarism. A candidate for the RPD however she did not want to talk to the weeklyshe only did it for PAP.