Purity in relation to the state and relations with entrepreneurship: Gál will make a copy of the anti-shield laws to the government



To this Andrej Leontiev, along with the lawyer and co-author of the amendment, reacted to the criticism of an unnamed member of the National Council (NR) of the SR and chairman of the extra-parliamentary party Total – Citizen Democracy Miroslav Beblavý, who warned that the government is beginning to dismantle the anti-shield law. According to Gala, nothing like this happens. "First of all, we do not dismantle, clarify or sharpen ourselves, they are partial things that are necessary because of exercise, how the law works and what we need to fine-tune ourselves." Gál explained. He was, in his own words, not surprised by the history that was created around the law.

"Some political parties that need to be visible have less than five percent, they have to have an idea of ​​something that happens, a sense of danger, and then they themselves become the role of saviors." Well, we do not need comparable pseudosupplies, " said the minister. The head of the ministry explained that he personally had nothing to do with the amendment, because he was ready at the time of his predecessor, Lucie Zitnanska (Most-Hid), who asked him to make his move as soon as possible. In the novel he worked the same team that had been prepared by the law itself.

According to Gala, the anti-foreclosure act has proven to be more than a year of practical experience, introducing purity in the relationship between the state and entrepreneurs, because it is no longer possible to deal with postal companies where their ownership structure would not be clear. "This law is still a showcase of transparency and one of the most important measures to combat corruption," he said.

Leontiev from the law firm Taylor Wessing said the amendment contains a series of technical measures to improve, tighten and eliminate the weaknesses that have been proven. "There is no reason why I should take part in a regulation that would dismantle, destroy, bury my own law, " said the lawyer, and in this case he was a & # 39; reputation & # 39; for him.

The anti-shield law, according to Leontiev, turned out to be functional. "The priority is that the state knows who it is dealing with." Secondary so that the public knows who deals with the trade, but in no case can the law itself stop the corruption, it can not shake off the lobbyists who have commissions from state orders, he can not automatically punish the political and family ties that can arise between the entrepreneur and an official, " he said on the margo that he did not want to meet the expectations of the public.

Beblavý, who worked with Zitnanska on the bill, criticizes the new because he wants to give public companies permission to work with letterbox companies like this "in the ordinary course of trade". The second serious problem is that two national financial institutions – the Slovak guarantee and development bank (SZRB) and Eximbanka – should be excluded from the law. Finally, he said that the proposal reported annoying reports of lobbying by activists.

Leontiev explained that the amendment only removes distortions vis-à-vis the private sector and introduces a single exemption for public companies whose customers do not have to register in the public sector register if they buy a product in the ordinary course of trade the main business activity of a government company.

In the case of SZRB and Eximbanka, the lawyer stated that, even after the amendment was adopted, these financial institutions would have to verify the end-users of the benefits to their customers under the Money Laundering and Money Laundering Act. Leontiev ultimately denied that the cost of taking evidence should be paid automatically by journalists and non-profit organizations that attack the truth of the data in the registry. His goal was to resolve who bears the burden of proof, who has not yet established the law.


Source link

Leave a Reply