This is heavy criticism in a recent research report by Sieps, the Swedish institute for European policy studies.
"At the moment we are in the middle of a national electoral movement, no EU is being discussed at all.We also point out in this report how inadequate this discussion is in the Swedish system and in Swedish society, which is obviously a democratic problem, because such a contradiction in EU policy must be given the opportunity to also debate as a voter, but we do not see that, "says Magnus Blomgren, associate professor of political science at the University of Umeå, and one of the authors of the report.
The problem with that Democratic anchoring EU policy is not new. One of the areas that the researchers criticize in the Sieps report is the way in which the Swedish parliamentarians work on the so-called subsidiarity principle.
The aim is to give EU Member States the right to make decisions about all matters that they themselves attach most importance to. It is only when the EU controls a task better that decisions have to be moved there.
If there is a proposal from the EU, the Riksdag committee will assess whether this is indeed a matter for the EU. If they come to the fact that the Riksdag must retain the right of decision, the European Commission will be informed.
It is particularly clear that in the Committee on the Environment and Agriculture, where more than half of the legislative proposals are based on proposals from the EU. That is why subsidiarity tests are often included in the committee's agenda.
Just know that There are five such processes at this meeting. The committee has no objection to the decision-making rights of the EU on one of the points. Martin Kinnunen is the representative of the Swedish Democrats in the Committee on the Environment and Agriculture.
– There were a few different questions. It was water conservation, heavy trucks & # 39; s and that the EU would spend money on environmental research. These were the problems that we had to deal with today and things are going very fast.
"On the other hand, the Swedish parliament is unique in fair subsidiarity trials, because we simply claim the Swedish legal order much more often than other parliaments, and politicians in other countries hardly know that subsidiarity tests exist, so it is a completely toothless instrument that hardly performs today. , adds Martin Kinnunen.
But the criticism The research report is not just about the fact that the Riksdag works on wrong things. It is primarily about the failure of political parties to act as a link between citizens and those in power by not highlighting current EU issues in the public debate.
Magnus Blomgren mentions the EU's future defense and security policy, the shrinking EU budget, the migration issue and the planned banking union as examples of issues that should have occurred in the constituency movement.
"One has to be aware that we are now choosing a parliament that in turn designates a government, and that the government is our strongest voice within the EU system, which means that the different government alternatives would, if this would work optimally, indicate how we can look at various important political issues at EU level in the coming years, but we do not hear that ", says Magnus Blomgren.
Åsa Westlund was former social-democratic European parliamentarian, she is now chairman of the Committee on the Environment and Agriculture. She believes that it is less important that voters know what political decision is being taken.
"In any case, I think the most important thing is what the parties want to achieve, then exactly how it will be, it is good that we politicians can of course answer that, but perhaps it is not necessary knowledge to vote.