It has long been discussed that it was difficult for law enforcement agencies and municipalities to share information to prevent violent extremism.
Filip Ahlin is an analyst at the Defense College and criticizes the shortcomings in the local work that the research has shown.
"There seems to be uncertainty about how to act locally against violent extremism, which can not be considered as unsuccessful, says Filip Ahlin.
The government added Last year's research, which shows that the police should be able to provide information to the social services more easily.
The researcher also suggests that social services should in turn be given the opportunity to share more confidential information. Among other things when someone is suspected of committing crimes in preparation of terrorist crimes or terrorist financing. Something that is not possible today.
Anna Tansjö is the person who asked this question.
"We found early on that there was a great willingness at the local level to contribute to the efforts to combat terrorism," says Anna Tansjö.
But the research showed thus to major shortcomings in only the local work against violence-inducing extremism. It has been difficult to get a clear picture of what kind of prevention work is actually done outside the municipalities. In many places there is still uncertainty about how this work will even be pursued.
– All extremists live on a local level, no one lives on a national level. That is why the work on violent extremism will take place at local level.
– The security police states that the violent environments have grown from 300 to 3000 in just a few years. We have had 300 people who have come to IS, 150 have returned. We have right-wing extremists on the move. I find this research to be such a heavy criticism as disconcerting, says Filip Ahlin.