Aldermen want to withdraw the immunity of the former National Council Miesch



According to the parliamentary services of Wednesday, the decision was 11 to 1 votes. The legal committee saw a direct link between the behavior of Miesch and his office. That is why she appealed to the federal prosecutor's request for waiver of immunity. In a second step she decided to cancel the immunity.

For the legal committee, the rule of law in law enforcement weighs against the institutional interests of Parliament. In her opinion, it is also in Miesch's interest to defend herself and her reputation in criminal proceedings. This is the only way to conclude that he has not committed a criminal offense.

National Council Commission does not agree with this

The Immunity Commission of the National Council had refused in June to cancel the parliamentary immunity of Miesch. She justified the decision with the deep injustice of behavior. Parliament's institutional interest weighs more heavily than the rule of law in law enforcement, she argued. If the Immunity Commission is a second time against waiving immunity, the petition is finally over.

The federal prosecutor wants to determine in connection with the so-called Kazakhstan affair against Miesch. Miesch, the lobbyist Thomas Borer 2015, as secretary of the Switzerland-Kazakhstan Group, would have imposed 4,635 CHF for a Senior General Plan 1st class. As a national council, Miesch already had a GA.

Borer speaks of a mistake

The federal public prosecutor suspects that Miesch has collected the money for filing an interpellation. It is about passive bribery and acceptance of benefits. Before the Immunity Commission of the National Council, Miesch had stated that he had submitted the interpellation on his own initiative.

According to Borer, the amount at Miesch was wrongly paid because of an error in the accounting. Miesch had the money back. Borer is also in the sights of the judiciary because of the case. The federal prosecutor's office has not yet opened criminal proceedings. She first wants to wait for the final decision about waiving the immunity of Miesch, as requested by the Keystone-SDA agency.

Transparency Switzerland: serious allegations

Transparency International Switzerland welcomes the decision to waive immunity. The management can align with media release: "If invoices are issued for alleged expenses or expenses that have not been incurred, these are classic constellations for corruption offenses."

Such allegations against a current or former National Council are "very serious and need to be clarified by criminal law", it says. Otherwise, the trust of the people in the people's representatives would be bad. It is therefore important that the immunity committee of the National Council now also thinks and follows this decision.

Blocher also received no immunity

The parliamentary committees rarely decide at the expense of their colleagues in the council. For example, the Bernese FDP national councilor Christa Markwalder was protected from prosecution in connection with the Kazakhstan affair.

In October 2016, however, the immunity of Schwyzer SVP National Council Pirmin Schwander was withdrawn. He would have supported a mother who hid her child from the KESB. In the Hildebrand affair, too, the responsible parliamentary committees came to the conclusion that Christoph Blocher was not protected by parliamentary immunity.

Miesch was in the National Council until 2015. He was elected twice in the big room, first in 1991 for the FDP, 2003 for the SVP. Twice he was not re-elected. After a resignation he lost again in 2014, 2015, but he did not return before the elections.

Therefore, for the first time, the committees also had to consider whether immunity also applies after leaving the Council. Both have answered in the affirmative. (SDA / duc)

Posted on 22.08.2018 | Updated at 13:52


Source link

Aldermen want to withdraw the immunity of the former National Council Miesch



According to the parliamentary services of Wednesday, the decision was 11 to 1 votes. The legal committee saw a direct link between the behavior of Miesch and his office. That is why she appealed to the federal prosecutor's request for waiver of immunity. In a second step she decided to cancel the immunity.

For the legal committee, the rule of law in law enforcement weighs against the institutional interests of Parliament. In her opinion, it is also in Miesch's interest to defend herself and her reputation in criminal proceedings. This is the only way to conclude that he has not committed a criminal offense.

National Council Commission does not agree with this

The Immunity Commission of the National Council had refused in June to cancel the parliamentary immunity of Miesch. She justified the decision with the deep injustice of behavior. Parliament's institutional interest weighs more heavily than the rule of law in law enforcement, she argued. If the Immunity Commission is a second time against waiving immunity, the petition is finally over.

The federal prosecutor wants to determine in connection with the so-called Kazakhstan affair against Miesch. Miesch, the lobbyist Thomas Borer 2015, as secretary of the Switzerland-Kazakhstan Group, would have imposed 4,635 CHF for a Senior General Plan 1st class. As a national council, Miesch already had a GA.

Borer speaks of a mistake

The federal public prosecutor suspects that Miesch has collected the money for filing an interpellation. It is about passive bribery and acceptance of benefits. Before the Immunity Commission of the National Council, Miesch had stated that he had submitted the interpellation on his own initiative.

According to Borer, the amount at Miesch was wrongly paid because of an error in the accounting. Miesch had the money back. Borer is also in the sights of the judiciary because of the case. The federal prosecutor's office has not yet opened criminal proceedings. She first wants to wait for the final decision about waiving the immunity of Miesch, as requested by the Keystone-SDA agency.

Transparency Switzerland: serious allegations

Transparency International Switzerland welcomes the decision to waive immunity. The management can align with media release: "If invoices are issued for alleged expenses or expenses that have not been incurred, these are classic constellations for corruption offenses."

Such allegations against a current or former National Council are "very serious and need to be clarified by criminal law", it says. Otherwise, the trust of the people in the people's representatives would be bad. It is therefore important that the immunity committee of the National Council now also thinks and follows this decision.

Blocher also received no immunity

The parliamentary committees rarely decide at the expense of their colleagues in the council. For example, the Bernese FDP national councilor Christa Markwalder was protected from prosecution in connection with the Kazakhstan affair.

In October 2016, however, the immunity of Schwyzer SVP National Council Pirmin Schwander was withdrawn. He would have supported a mother who hid her child from the KESB. In the Hildebrand affair, too, the responsible parliamentary committees came to the conclusion that Christoph Blocher was not protected by parliamentary immunity.

Miesch was in the National Council until 2015. He was elected twice in the big room, first in 1991 for the FDP, 2003 for the SVP. Twice he was not re-elected. After a resignation he lost again in 2014, 2015, but he did not return before the elections.

Therefore, for the first time, the committees also had to consider whether immunity also applies after leaving the Council. Both have answered in the affirmative. (SDA / duc)

Posted on 22.08.2018 | Updated at 13:52


Source link

Leave a Reply