District Court of Zurich: acquittal or 16 years imprisonment required – supra-regional

On Monday morning, October 19, 2009, the shoe salesman left her home in Zurich-Oerlikon to go to work. But in the immediate vicinity of the entrance to the house she is hit in the vicinity of at least five shots in the head, hands and thighs. She dies on the spot.

For the prosecutor this could have been no other than her husband. Except for him, nobody had a motive to murder the woman, the prosecutor told the court in Zurich. Because of her love affair with another man, the man was "eaten away" by jealousy and hatred.

The horned husband, according to the prosecutor, apparently feared for his reputation and his two sons, then 5 and 12 years old. The man had taken revenge and went for his ex-wife's shot. It was a real execution.

The accused was one of the few people who knew the irregular work plan of the shoe salesperson. "He has no alibi for the crime," said the prosecutor. Moreover, after the fact the researchers had found traces of smoke on his hands and the mantle.

However, because the evidence was not clear, the Prosecution used two undercover researchers – disguised as a fortune teller and as a Turkish diamond merchant with marital problems.

Hang on the spiritual

With the two disguises, the authorities used the world of the accused, who sought contact with fortune tellers and was interested in rituals and spirituality.

In comparison with the "fortune teller", according to the public prosecutor, the defendant also admitted the act. The confession was not enforced, she said in her plea. The accused had said that he had bad pictures in his head, that he was responsible – but his wife had done so much wrong.

Compared to the other undercover investigator, the accused apparently said that it was right for scammers to receive their just punishment. "The punishment for a cheater is death, nothing else," he would have said.

Confession withdrawn

The alleged confession pulled back the now 62-year-old man. He was under pressure because he was threatened. He also wanted to bluff, he said in court.

Because his defender is clear: the researchers wanted to force the accused to confess in a way. He was convinced of the innocence of his client. The confession was neither credible nor useful. The man was under pressure and was extra scared.

Especially in the extensive research the defender, who asks for acquittal, sees above all something: innocence. The suspect was being watched, his car was bugged, his telephones and calls from telephone booths had been intercepted. The files fill approximately 40 federal folders. In addition, the man spent a total of 16 months in custody.

When the verdict is opened, it is opened. It is no longer expected on Wednesday.


Created: 22.08.2018, 18:08 clock

Source link

Leave a Reply