No protection for corruption – Switzerland: standard



Eleven councilors want the federal public prosecutor to examine SVP man Christian Miesch on suspicion of corruption. Only a gentleman refuses this.

It is a decision of great importance: historically, because for the first time in the history of Switzerland a committee prepares to lift the immunity of a parliamentarian. Politics, because in the gray area of ​​politics, funding was obtained for a clear line. Institutional, because the Council of States offers their colleagues from the immunity committee of the national council the opportunity to correct a disastrously wrong decision of the state policy.

The National Councils argued in June that a criminal investigation against Christian Miesch would be disproportionate because his behavior was a deep injustice. had. In addition, the amount of the transaction – 4635 francs from lobbyist Thomas Borer flowed to the then National Council Miesch – low. Beautiful words, deadly effect: national councils have even introduced the de minimis threshold for corruption offenses. Up to an amount of 5,000 francs, politicians would be able to accept funds in the future without any worries. Finally you enjoy immunity! Black boxes: no. Black Kässeli: Yes.

However, the National Councils have to return to their decision in the Miesch Causa for another reason: the SVP man was protected by a civilian Entente in June. SVP and FDP representatives fought together and concluded for Miesch. With the exceptionally clear decision of the Council of States, the suspicion has now been reinforced that the Miesch case was tried in June according to party political and non-factual aspects. It would be a bankruptcy declaration for the National Council for Immunity Commission, which was established in 2012 solely with the aim of achieving a "depoliticization" of the cases.

(Tages-Anzeiger)

Created: 22.08.2018, 20:22 clock


Source link

No protection for corruption – Switzerland: standard



Eleven councilors want the federal public prosecutor to examine SVP man Christian Miesch on suspicion of corruption. Only a gentleman refuses this.

It is a decision of great importance: historically, because for the first time in the history of Switzerland a committee prepares to lift the immunity of a parliamentarian. Politics, because in the gray area of ​​politics, funding was obtained for a clear line. Institutional, because the Council of States offers their colleagues from the immunity committee of the national council the opportunity to correct a disastrously wrong decision of the state policy.

The National Councils argued in June that a criminal investigation against Christian Miesch would be disproportionate because his behavior was a deep injustice. had. In addition, the amount of the transaction – 4635 francs from lobbyist Thomas Borer flowed to the then National Council Miesch – low. Beautiful words, deadly effect: national councils have even introduced the de minimis threshold for corruption offenses. Up to an amount of 5,000 francs, politicians would be able to accept funds in the future without any worries. Finally you enjoy immunity! Black boxes: no. Black Kässeli: Yes.

However, the National Councils have to return to their decision in the Miesch Causa for another reason: the SVP man was protected by a civilian Entente in June. SVP and FDP representatives fought together and concluded for Miesch. With the exceptionally clear decision of the Council of States, the suspicion has now been reinforced that the Miesch case was tried in June according to party political and non-factual aspects. It would be a bankruptcy declaration for the National Council for Immunity Commission, which was established in 2012 solely with the aim of achieving a "depoliticization" of the cases.

(Tages-Anzeiger)

Created: 22.08.2018, 20:22 clock


Source link

Leave a Reply