The couple would have made Brand von Steckborn negligent

The lawsuit began on Monday with the hearing of the 48-year-old man and the 47-year-old woman. Like the other residents of the six houses in Steckborn, they had lost their possessions by fire and had to be rescued by the fire brigade.

The prosecutor accuses them of unloading a lithium-polymer battery because it is used in making models. During the night it was overcrowded, then overheated and eventually burned, causing damage of around 12 million francs.

During the interrogation, the couple confirmed the process on essential points, as the charge had collected: the man received from a friend a model car with a charger. He took the battery out of the car to charge it. First the charger and the battery were in the kitchen, then the woman cleaned it and put it back in the closet in a socket. There the fire broke out later.

The Dutch-speaking spouse said in court that he did not know the dangers of lithium polymer batteries. He used the device like other chargers, such as those for the phone. He does not think he has done something wrong. He did not know about warnings.

The woman said she had not thought about possible dangers. It was about a "toy car" away. Her husband could read badly. "Not in German," she said.

The Public Prosecutor noted that the man had created a danger in which he brought the model car and the battery into the apartment. There are always reports in the media about the dangers that go with it. Even before flying, the danger of explosion of rechargeable batteries is pointed out.

Warnings were printed on the battery that were readable even after the fire. To know the dangers, the general life experience is sufficient.

Similarly, the legal representatives of the 22 private prosecutors argued. It was a special battery that would normally be kept in a fireproof bag. The couple had to miss it for conscientious circumspection.

The public prosecutor demanded a conditional fine of 30 daily rates of 30 francs and a fine of 600 francs for the man. For the woman he demanded a conditional fine of ten daily rates of 30 francs and a fine of 300 francs.

The Prosecution left an alternative open: according to the Penal Code, it is possible to waive punishment if the perpetrators are so severely affected by the immediate consequences of a criminal offense that a punishment would be inappropriate.

The hearing will resume on Tuesday with the pleas of the defense. (SDA)

Posted on 20.08.2018 | Updated at 12:02

Source link

Leave a Reply