The court disagreed on the main theme in the Rupperswil case



For the quadruple murder of Rupperswil, the Lenzburg District Court rendered the written decision. It shows that a minority of judges is in favor of lifelong custody.

Daniel Gerny, Erich Aschwanden

Thomas N. was sentenced to life imprisonment in March. (Image: Walter Bieri / Epa)

Thomas N. was sentenced to life imprisonment in March. (Image: Walter Bieri / Epa)

Last March, the judges of the Lenzburg District Court sentenced defendant Thomas N. to life imprisonment. At the same time they gave the right custody and decided to stop the life-long preservation. Now it appears: the five judges were divided on the question of what kind of child custody should be pronounced. A minority pleaded for lifelong deprivation of liberty and wanted to follow the request of the public prosecutor. This is clear from the written verdict on the fourfold murder in Rupperswil, which was published on Wednesday.

Profession within 20 days

The minority came to the conclusion based on statements from one of the two psychiatric experts that the quadruple murder was ultimately not due to a mental disorder, therefore no need for treatment was given and the accused could not be treated. The court, however, has accepted the view that a reliable decision on the success of a therapy can be taken at the earliest in ten to fifteen years. Whether the verdict is passed to the next instance is open. Both the public prosecutor and the defendant's defendant said they would now analyze the written verdict and decide what they would do next. Appointments must be made within the next 20 days.

The written judgment indicates that Thomas N was interviewed eight times between 12 May and 19 December 2016. Just as in court, the testimony of the accused about the motive and the intention to kill was already contradictory in the interrogations. He had not wanted to kill anyone who was present, he repeatedly said. Only when the older son was able to get rid of the shackles, he had returned to his original plan. It was "the perfect crime for him, it was logical for him," says N. in the verdict.

«Kill, burn, go»

He did not want to get entangled in the & # 39; construct & # 39 ;, as the accused states consistently. "He did not care if he had to kill 100 people." In this construction he realized: "Death, burned, go away." Asked about the gross mismatch between the prey of about 11,000 francs and the defendant stated that "50,000 francs would have been gross". No money justifies such acts.

Only when the indictment was made public just before the trial began in March of this year, it became known that Thomas N. had planned further acts after Rupperswil. In an interrogation, the defendant admitted on the day before his arrest on 11 May 2016 that he had filled the rucksack with numerous items for another crime and stood in front of the house of other potential victims. It was a sensation. He had the image of himself in mind, if he had once again committed such an act as on December 21, 2015.

Thomas N. had falsified letters that identified him as a school psychologist that day in a house nearby in Rupperswil AG, where a 13-year-old boy lived, who stood at the center of his pedophile desire. Threatened with a knife he brought the boy, his 48-year-old mother, the still-sleeping 19-year-old son and his 21-year-old friend into his power, captivated them and sealed their mouths. He forced the mother to collect money from two banks. Then he died at the 13-year-old. Then he killed all four people, lit the house and went away. Shortly thereafter, on the Internet, he again sought out boys who loved him and spied on their families.


Source link

The court disagreed on the main theme in the Rupperswil case



For the quadruple murder of Rupperswil, the Lenzburg District Court rendered the written decision. It shows that a minority of judges is in favor of lifelong custody.

Daniel Gerny, Erich Aschwanden

Thomas N. was sentenced to life imprisonment in March. (Image: Walter Bieri / Epa)

Thomas N. was sentenced to life imprisonment in March. (Image: Walter Bieri / Epa)

Last March, the judges of the Lenzburg District Court sentenced defendant Thomas N. to life imprisonment. At the same time they gave the right custody and decided to stop the life-long preservation. Now it appears: the five judges were divided on the question of what kind of child custody should be pronounced. A minority pleaded for lifelong deprivation of liberty and wanted to follow the request of the public prosecutor. This is clear from the written verdict on the fourfold murder in Rupperswil, which was published on Wednesday.

Profession within 20 days

The minority came to the conclusion based on statements from one of the two psychiatric experts that the quadruple murder was ultimately not due to a mental disorder, therefore no need for treatment was given and the accused could not be treated. The court, however, has accepted the view that a reliable decision on the success of a therapy can be taken at the earliest in ten to fifteen years. Whether the verdict is passed to the next instance is open. Both the public prosecutor and the defendant's defendant said they would now analyze the written verdict and decide what they would do next. Appointments must be made within the next 20 days.

The written judgment indicates that Thomas N was interviewed eight times between 12 May and 19 December 2016. Just as in court, the testimony of the accused about the motive and the intention to kill was already contradictory in the interrogations. He had not wanted to kill anyone who was present, he repeatedly said. Only when the older son was able to get rid of the shackles, he had returned to his original plan. It was "the perfect crime for him, it was logical for him," says N. in the verdict.

«Kill, burn, go»

He did not want to get entangled in the & # 39; construct & # 39 ;, as the accused states consistently. "He did not care if he had to kill 100 people." In this construction he realized: "Death, burned, go away." Asked about the gross mismatch between the prey of about 11,000 francs and the defendant stated that "50,000 francs would have been gross". No money justifies such acts.

Only when the indictment was made public just before the trial began in March of this year, it became known that Thomas N. had planned further acts after Rupperswil. In an interrogation, the defendant admitted on the day before his arrest on 11 May 2016 that he had filled the rucksack with numerous items for another crime and stood in front of the house of other potential victims. It was a sensation. He had the image of himself in mind, if he had once again committed such an act as on December 21, 2015.

Thomas N. had falsified letters that identified him as a school psychologist that day in a house nearby in Rupperswil AG, where a 13-year-old boy lived, who stood at the center of his pedophile desire. Threatened with a knife he brought the boy, his 48-year-old mother, the still-sleeping 19-year-old son and his 21-year-old friend into his power, captivated them and sealed their mouths. He forced the mother to collect money from two banks. Then he died at the 13-year-old. Then he killed all four people, lit the house and went away. Shortly thereafter, on the Internet, he again sought out boys who loved him and spied on their families.


Source link

Leave a Reply