Samsung Leak unveils massive Galaxy S10 upgrade




<div _ngcontent-c16 = "" innerhtml = "

There is already enough known about the Galaxy S10 to confirm be a game-changer (in front of several reasons). But now new information reveals that Samsung is also set on the worst of its premium Galaxy phones … & nbsp;

Thanks to a great place by the (always vigilant) GalaxyClub.nl, we learn that Samsung is secretly working on delivering much faster Android updates to its phones. And the change has big consequences for the Galaxy S10.

The Galaxy S10 (concept pictured) is the most ambitious smartphone from Samsung that lasts for yearsConcept Creator

The giveaway comes from GalaxyClub that digs in the database of popular benchmarking software GFXBench. It discovered that Samsung Android 9.0 Pie on the Galaxy S9 Plus already tested less than a month after the software was released by Google.

To put this in the right context: it took until November before Samsung even started beta testing of Android 8.0 Oreo on the Galaxy S8 (three months after the release) and until September 2018, seven months after the platform was launched, the Galaxy S8- owners have not yet reached. Google even launched the first public beta of Android 9.0 Pie for the first time.

Should we doubt this leak? No. While GalaxyClub notes that GFXBench describes the update as "invalid Android Samsung ss edition," this actually helps to prove it's real. Samsung's heavy adjustment of the stock Android causes this reaction from GFXBench and can even be used historically to look up Samsung software development.

But why would Samsung suddenly change its (famously awful) software update strategy just before the Galaxy S10 is launched? Because there is both a carrot and a stick.

The Android One program from Google is embraced by Samsung's rivalsGoogle

The root is how Google has made upgrading Android easier for third parties Project Treble that separates the core operating system from third-party upgrades. And this process is further refined in Android Pie.

The stick is that Samsung has little choice. The introduction of Google's Android One & # 39; program with promising stocks of Android and direct updates has been embraced by Samsung's rivals, including LG, Motorola, Nokia and major Chinese threats: Huawei and Xiaomi. The growing Pixel brand from Google promises the same.

Suddenly, Samsung can not afford to leave its software behind. Especially next dull& nbsp; sale of Galaxy S9.

Consequently, Samsung's already impressive Galaxy S10 hardware – including 5G, true 3D facial mapping and a finger reader in display (even for the new budget model) – looks like it is accompanied by equally updated software. Really, this can be a 10th anniversary Galaxy S to remember … & nbsp;

___

Follow Gordon twitter, Facebook and Google+

More about Forbes

Samsung brings readers to all three Galaxy S10 models

Samsung Partner confirms Galaxy S10 is compatible with 5G

Samsung Galaxy S10 has significant design changes

Galaxy Note 9 Vs Galaxy Note 8: What & # 39; s The Difference?

Galaxy Note 9 Vs Galaxy S9 Plus: what's the difference?

">

There is already enough known about the Galaxy S10 to confirm be a game-changer (in front of several reasons). But now new information reveals that Samsung is also going to tackle the worst of its premium Galaxy phones …

Thanks to a great place by the (always vigilant) GalaxyClub.nl, we learn that Samsung is secretly working on delivering much faster Android updates to its phones. And the change has big consequences for the Galaxy S10.

The Galaxy S10 (concept pictured) is the most ambitious smartphone from Samsung that lasts for yearsConcept Creator

The giveaway comes from GalaxyClub that digs in the database of popular benchmarking software GFXBench. It discovered that Samsung Android 9.0 Pie on the Galaxy S9 Plus already tested less than a month after the software was released by Google.

To put this in the right context: it took until November before Samsung even started beta testing of Android 8.0 Oreo on the Galaxy S8 (three months after the release) and until September 2018, seven months after the platform was launched, the Galaxy S8- owners have not yet reached. Google even launched the first public beta of Android 9.0 Pie for the first time.

Should we doubt this leak? No. While GalaxyClub notes that GFXBench describes the update as "invalid Android Samsung ss edition," this actually helps to prove it's real. Samsung's heavy adjustment of the stock Android causes this reaction from GFXBench and can even be used historically to look up Samsung software development.

But why would Samsung suddenly change its (famously awful) software update strategy just before the Galaxy S10 is launched? Because there is both a carrot and a stick.

The Android One program from Google is embraced by Samsung's rivalsGoogle

The root is how Google has made upgrading Android easier for third parties Project Treble that separates the core operating system from third-party upgrades. And this process is further refined in Android Pie.

The stick is that Samsung has little choice. The introduction of Google's Android One & # 39; program with promising stocks of Android and direct updates has been embraced by Samsung's rivals, including LG, Motorola, Nokia and major Chinese threats: Huawei and Xiaomi. The growing Pixel brand from Google promises the same.

Suddenly, Samsung can not afford to leave its software behind. Especially next dull Galaxy S9 sales.

Consequently, Samsung's already impressive Galaxy S10 hardware – including 5G, true 3D facial mapping and a finger reader in display (even for the new budget model) – looks like it is accompanied by equally updated software. Really, this could be a 10th anniversary Galaxy S to remember …

___

Follow Gordon twitter, Facebook and Google+

More about Forbes

Samsung brings readers to all three Galaxy S10 models

Samsung Partner confirms Galaxy S10 is compatible with 5G

Samsung Galaxy S10 has significant design changes

Galaxy Note 9 Vs Galaxy Note 8: What & # 39; s The Difference?

Galaxy Note 9 Vs Galaxy S9 Plus: what's the difference?


Source link

Leave a Reply